Journal Information
Vol. 53. Issue 6.
Pages 580-585 (1 December 2000)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 53. Issue 6.
Pages 580-585 (1 December 2000)
Full text access
Uso del chupete: beneficios y riesgos
Pacifier use. Risks and benefits
Visits
55526
L. Martínez Sánchez
Corresponding author
33050lms@comb.es

Correspondencia: Servicio de Pediatría. Hospital Sant Joan de Déu. P.° Sant Joan de Déu, 2. 08950 Esplugues de Llobregat. Barcelona.
, E.P. Díaz González, S. García-Tornel Florensa, J. Gaspà Martí
Unidad Integrada de Pediatría Hospital Sant Joan de Déu-Hospital Clínic. Universidad de Barcelona
This item has received
Article information

El uso del chupete como objeto reconfortante en la infancia es una práctica ampliamente extendida en las sociedades civilizadas. La conveniencia de utilizar o no el chupete es una cuestión debatida. Algunos aspectos como su forma, material o el tiempo de empleo son polémicos. Existen numerosos datos acerca de posibles efectos beneficiosos, pero también una larga lista de procesos que se le han asociado. Su efecto tranquilizante es el aspecto beneficioso más ampliamente reconocido; la posible relación con una menor incidencia del síndrome de muerte súbita del lactante el más novedoso.

Entre los riesgos de este hábito de succión no nutritiva destacan el fracaso de la lactancia materna, las malformaciones dentarias, la asociación con otitis aguda media de repetición y el riesgo de accidentes. El desarrollo de hipersensibilidad al látex, policaries, úlceras orales traumáticas o alteraciones del sueño son otros posibles riesgos. La asociación con un menor coeficiente de inteligencia en el adulto es discutida.

La revisión de las ventajas y desventajas del uso del chupete no aporta datos suficientes para estimular ni prohibir este hábito, pero sí para realizar firmes recomendaciones en cuanto a no iniciar su uso antes de los 15 días de vida, restringirlo a partir de los 8 meses y suprimirlo al año. Los pediatras deben conocer y recomendar sólo los chupetes que cumplan las normas de seguridad.

Palabras clave:
Chupete
Morbilidad
Hábitos
Succión
Infancia

The use of a dummy as a comforting object in childhood is widespread in civilized societies. The advisability of this practice, as well as the shape, material, or time of use of these objects, is controversial. Data on the possible beneficial effects of these objects are numerous, but there is also a long list of disorders which have been associated with their use. Their soothing effect is the most widely recognized beneficial effect and the possible relationship with a lower incidence of sudden infant death syndrome is the newest. The most important risks of this non-nutritive sucking habit are failure of breastfeeding, dental deformities, recurrent acute otitis media, and the risk of accidents. The development of latex allergy, tooth decay, oral ulcers and sleep disorders are other possible problems. The association with a lower intelligence quotient is disputed.Insufficient data are provided by a review of the pros and the cons of dummy use to encourage or discourage this habit. However, there are sufficient data on which to base firm recommendations such as not starting their use in the first days of life, restricting use after the age of 8 months and withdrawing these objects at the age of 1 year. Pediatricians should be aware of and recommend only dummies that meet safety requirements.

Key words:
Pacifier
Morbidity
Suction
Habits
Children
Baby care
Full text is only aviable in PDF
Bibliografía
[1.]
R.S. Illingingwoth.
Longman Group, (1979),
[2.]
A. Cahuana, J. Moncunill, J. Roca, C. Valero.
Hàbits de succió no nutritiva en edat preescolar i la seva relació amb les maloclusions. Estudi prospectiu de 200 nens.
Ped Cat, 58 (1998), pp. 332-337
[3.]
K. North, P. Fleming, J. Golding.
Pacifier use and morbidity in the first six months of life.
Pediatrics, 103 (1999), pp. 34
[4.]
G. Gotsch.
Pacifiers: yes or noα.
New Beginnings, 12 (1995), pp. 172-173
[5.]
B.D. Schmitt.
Planeta, (1993),
[6.]
E. Mitchell, B. Taylor, R. Ford, A. Stewart, D. Becorft, J. Thompson.
Dummies and the sudden infant death syndrome.
Arch Dis Child, 68 (1993), pp. 501-504
[7.]
M. Arnestad, M. Andersen, T. Rognum.
Is the use of dummy or carry-cot of importance for sudden infant deth syndromeα.
Eur J Pediatr, 156 (1997), pp. 968-970
[8.]
P. Fleming, P. Blair, K. Pollard, M. Ward Platt, C. Leach, J. Smith.
Pacifier use and sudden infant death syndrome: results from the CESDI/SUDI case control study.
Arch Dis Child, 81 (1999), pp. 112-116
[9.]
J.C. Bernbaum, G.R. Pereira, J.B. Watkins, G.J. Peckham.
Nonnutritive sucking during gavage feeding enhances growth and maduration in premature infants.
Pediatrics, 71 (1983), pp. 41-45
[10.]
T. Field, E. Ignatoff, S. Stringer, J. Brennan, R. Greenberg, S. Widmayer.
Nonnutritive sucking during tube feedings: effects on preterm neonates in an intensive care unit.
Pediatrics, 70 (1982), pp. 381-384
[11.]
J. DiPietro, R. Cusson, M. Caughy, N. Fox.
Behavioral and physiologic effects of nonnutritive sucking during gavage feeding in preterm infants.
Pediatr Res, 36 (1994), pp. 207-214
[12.]
M. Niemelä, M. Uhari, M. Möttönen.
A pacifier increases the risk of recurrent acute otitis media in children in day care centers.
Pediatrics, 96 (1995), pp. 884-888
[13.]
G. Gale, C. Martyn.
Breastfeeding, dummy use and adult intelligence.
Lancet, 347 (1996), pp. 1072-1075
[14.]
A. Lucas, R. Morley.
Breastfeeding, dummy use and adult intelligence.
Lancet, 347 (1996), pp. 1765
[15.]
F. Cockburn, D. Tappin, D. Stone.
Breastfeeding, dummy use and adult intelligence.
Lancet, 347 (1996), pp. 1764-1765
[16.]
J. Lehtonen, M. Könönen, M. Purhonen, J. Partanen, S. Saarikoski, K. Launiala.
The effect of nursing on the brain activity of the newborn.
J Pediatr, 132 (1998), pp. 646-651
[17.]
M. Neifert, R. Lawrence, J. Seacat.
Nipple confusion: toward a formal definition.
J Pediatr, 126 (1995), pp. 125-129
[18.]
C. Howard, F. Howard, B. Lanphear, E. de Blieck, S. Eberly, R. Lawrence.
The effects of early pacifier use on breastfeeding duration.
Pediatrics, 103 (1999), pp. 33
[19.]
C. Gomes, D. Pareja, F.C. Barros, M.T. Anselmo, E. Weiderpass.
Pacifier use and short breastffeding duration: cause, consequence or coincidenceα.
Pediatrics, 99 (1997), pp. 445-453
[20.]
S. Orenstein.
Effect of nonnutritive sucking on infant gastroesophageal reflux.
[21.]
M. Paulov, C. Naulin-Ifi.
Plaidoyer pour une prévention et une prise en charge précoce du syndrome du biberon.
Arch Pediatr, 6 (1999), pp. 218-222
[22.]
C. Pedra, C. Moraes, B. Ejzenberg, E. Baldacci, Y. Okay.
Oral palatine ulcers of a traumatic nature in infants: Bednar’s aphthae.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, 35 (1996), pp. 39-49
[23.]
N. Izenberg, P. Izenberg, S. Dowshen.
Facial trauma from a rigid infant pacifier face shield.
Clin Pediatr, 32 (1993), pp. 558-560
[24.]
D. Simkiss, i. Sheppard.
Airway obstruction by a child’s pacifier -could flange desing be saferα.
Eur J Pediatr, 157 (1998), pp. 252-254
[25.]
w. Abramovits.
Resistant oral candidiasis in an infant due to pacifier contamination.
Clin Pediatr, 20 (1981), pp. 393
[26.]
p. Oleila, M. Niemela, M. Uhari, M. Larmas.
Risk factors for colonization of salivary lactobacilli and candida in children.
Acta Odontol Scand, 55 (1997), pp. 5-13
[27.]
L. Gros, M. Mediavila, J. Bone.
Hipersensibilidad al látex.
Bol Soc Pediatr Arag Rioj Sor, 27 (1997), pp. 61-71
[28.]
S. Mäkinen-Kiljunen, R. Sorva, K. Juntunen-Backman.
Latex dummies like allergens.
Lancet, 339 (1992), pp. 1608-1609
[29.]
B. Niggemann, M. Kulig, R. Bergmann, U. Whan.
Development of latex allergy in children up to 5 years of age- a retrospective analysis of risk factors.
Pediatr Allergy Immunol, 9 (1998), pp. 36-39
[30.]
R. Morley, C.J. Morley, P. Lucas, A. Lucas.
Conforters and night waking.
Arch Dis Child, 64 (1989), pp. 1624-1626
[31.]
E. Hultcrantz, B. Löftstrand-Tideström, J. Ahlquist-Rastad.
The epidemiology of sleep related breathing disorder in children.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, 32 (1995), pp. 63-66
Copyright © 2000. Asociación Española de Pediatría
Download PDF
Idiomas
Anales de Pediatría (English Edition)
Article options
Tools
es en

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?