Journal Information
Vol. 102. Issue 2.
(1 February 2025)
Scientific Letter
Full text access
Factors associated with later toilet training and longer training times: A multicenter cross-sectional study
Factores determinantes de un control de esfínter anal tardío y de mayores tiempos de entrenamiento: un estudio multicéntrico transversal
Visits
122
Miguel Ángel Carro Rodrígueza,
Corresponding author
miguel.carro@hgvillalba.es

Corresponding author.
, Josefa Barrio Torresb, Sara Beatriz García Chaguacedaa, Beatriz Martínez Escribanob
a Unidad de Gastroenterología y Nutrición Pediátrica, Servicio de Pediatría, Hospital Universitario General de Villalba, Collado Villalba, Madrid, Spain
b Unidad de Gastroenterología y Nutrición Pediátrica, Servicio de Pediatría, Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, Fuenlabrada, Madrid, Spain
This item has received
Article information
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Tables (2)
Table 1. Determinants of age at initiation of toilet training and at achievement of anal sphincter control and duration of training.
Table 2. Reasons for toilet training.
Show moreShow less
Full Text
To the Editor:

Toilet training often poses a challenge to parents and caregivers. Although this is a frequent reason for consultation, there is a certain lack of evidence on the subject.1

Early initiation of toilet training (before age 27 months) is associated with longer duration of training,2 but the existing evidence on its impact on future constipation is contradictory.3,4 In Western countries, there has been a trend toward later completion of toilet training,5 particularly in boys, children of working parents and children with developmental delay.6

With the aim of describing the factors associated with the time of initiation of toilet training and the time to achievement of anal sphincter (bowel) control, as well as their association with the prevalence of constipation after toilet training, we carried out a multicenter cross-sectional retrospective study in 2 Spanish hospitals over a 6-mo period. We distributed a 25-item questionnaire to parents of children aged less than 5 years who were in any of the waiting areas of two secondary care hospitals, whose child had completed toilet training (defined as the period spanning from the first time the diaper was not used to the time the diaper was no longer used for bowel movements) in the past 24 mo, in order to collect data on demographic and clinical variables. The statistical analysis was performed with the software SPSS version 25.

Of the total of 239 received responses, 232 were included in the analysis (7 were excluded because they were incomplete), of which 122 referred to boys (52.6%) and 110 to girls (47.4%). The median age at initiation of toilet training was 28.87 mo (IQR, 6.67) with a median age at achievement of bowel control of 3 mo (IQR, 6). The median duration of toilet training was 3 weeks (IQR, 5).

Table 1 summarizes the findings concerning the factors associated with the age at achievement of bowel control and the duration of toilet training. In the univariate analysis, male sex, language delay and a history of past or current cow’s milk protein allergy (CMPA) were significantly associated with delayed initiation of toilet training and of achievement of bowel control, but not with the total duration of toilet training. On the other hand, preterm birth was significantly associated with earlier initiation of toilet training and achievement of bowel control, but also not associated with toilet training duration.

Table 1.

Determinants of age at initiation of toilet training and at achievement of anal sphincter control and duration of training.

Determinant  Age at anal sphincter control, months, median (IQR)  P  Age at initiation of training, months, median (IQR)  P  Duration of toilet training, weeks, median (IQR)  P 
Total sample  232  30 (6)    28.87 (6.75)    3 (5)   
[0,1–8]Sex
Male  122  30 (6)  <.001  29.5 (7)  <.001  3 (5)  .99 
Female  110  29 (8)    27.5 (6.75)    3 (6)   
[0,1–8]Paternal origin
Spain  209  30 (6.25)  .272  29 (6.56)  .127  3 (4)  .103 
South America  13  28 (9)    27.5 (11)    6 (8)   
Other             
[0,1–8]Paternal educational attainment
No education    .605    .705    .477 
Primary  20  29 (9)    27.62 (9.44)    3 (6)   
Secondary  55  30 (5)    28.87 8 (6.5)    2.5 (6)   
University  156  30 (6)    29 (7.5)    3 (4)   
[0,1–8]Maternal origin
Spain  207  30 (6)  .720  28.75 (6.75)  .614  3 (4)  .489 
South America  20  30 (6.5)    28 (9.5)    4 (7)   
Other             
[0,1–8]Maternal educational attainment
No education    .112    .329    .261 
Primary  32 (11)    31.5 (10.25)    2 (4)   
Secondary  31  28 (5.5)    27.75 (6)    2 (2)   
University  196  30 (6.75)    29 (6.93)    3 (5)   
[0,1–8]Older siblings
Yes  88  30 (8)  .454  28.87 (7.75)  .982  3 (3)  .128 
No  144  30 (5)    28.87 (6.69)    3 (4)   
[0,1–8]Preterm birth (< 37 weeks)a
Yes  21  27 (6)  .024  24 (7.19)  .026  2 (8)  .979 
No  195  30 (6)    29 (6.5)    3 (4)   
[0,1–8]Cow’s milk protein allergy
Yes  10  33.5 (7)  .021  32.62 (7)  .016  4 (4)  .926 
No  118  30 (6)    28.62 (6.69)    3 (5)   
[0,1–8]Language delay
Yes  34 (6)  .014  32.4 (4.5)  .042  4 (6)  .390 
No  227  30 (6)    28.75 (6.5)    3 (5)   
[0,1–8]Age at initiation of toilet training
< 27 mo  85  25.00 (4)  <.001  23.62 (3.5)  <.001  3 (8)  .014 
> 27 mo  147  32.00 (4)    30.50 (4.44)    2 (3)   
[0,1–8]Age at school enrolment
< 36 mo  95  30.00 (5)  .105  29.00 (6)  .143  3 (2)  .381 
> 36 mo  118  30.00 (7)    29.25 (7.75)    3 (7)   

Abbreviation: IQR, interquartile range.

P values of less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Statistically significant results are presented in boldface.

a

19/22 born before 32 weeks, 3/22 born between 28 and 32 weeks.

We found a positive association between the age at initiation of toilet training and the age at achievement of bowel control (Spearman ρ = 0.939; P < .001), with a negative correlation between age at initiation of toilet training and its total duration (ρ = −0.233; P < .001). Thus, initiation of toilet training before 27 mo was associated with bowel control at an earlier age (25 mo [IQR, 4] vs 32 mo [IQR, 4]; P < .001) at the cost of longer duration of toilet training (3 weeks [IQR, 8] vs 2 weeks [IQR,3], P = .014).

Table 2 presents the reasons that prompted initiation of toilet training. The only one associated with delayed achievement of bowel control was enrollment in school (age 32 mo [IQR, 6] vs 29 mo [IQR, 5] in toilet training initiated for other reasons; P < .01), while the duration of toilet training did not vary significantly in relation to the reason for its initiation.

Table 2.

Reasons for toilet training.

Reason for toilet training  N (%)  Age at anal sphincter control, months, median (IQR)  Age at initiation of training, months, median (IQR)  Duration of toilet training, weeks, median (IQR) 
Enrolment in school  52 (22.41%)  32 (6)  31.5 (4.38)  3 (6) 
The parents felt the child was ready  136 (58.62%)  30 (5)  28.62 (5.81)  2 (4) 
The child expressed wanting  80 (34.48%)  29 (7)  27.87 (7.50)  2 (4) 
Recommended by teachers  13 (15.60%)  28 (4)  27.50 (4.13)  4 (2) 
Cost-saving  3 (1.29%)  28 (5)  27.00 (5.25)  2 (1.5) 

Abbreviation: IQR, interquartile range.

In the multivariate analysis, only male sex, CMPA and initiation of toilet training due to school enrolment were identified as factors independently associated with delayed bowel control.

The prevalence of constipation (defined as fewer than 3 bowel movements a week, Bristol stool scale ≤ 2, use of laxatives, fecal retention behaviors, painful defecation or anal fissures/rectal bleeding) was lower before than after initiation of toilet training (73 patients [31.2%] vs 33 [14.1%]; P < .001). Of the 33 children who had constipation after toilet training initiation, 21 (63.6%) had constipation before training started (OR, 4.95; CI, 2.28–10.76; P < .001). The presence of constipation before toilet training was not associated significantly with the age at achievement of bowel control, age of initiation of toilet training or its duration. The prevalence of the use of laxatives decreased from 19.5% to 7.3% after achievement of bowel control (P < .001). When it came to the subjective perception of parents, 27.8% reported improvement of constipation after completion of toilet training, while 8.3% reported worsening.

Our study found an association between older age at toilet training initiation and older age at achievement of bowel control, although with a shorter duration of training compared to children who started it earlier. Male sex, CMPA and initiation of toilet training due to school enrolment were independently associated with toilet training at a later age, without significant differences in the duration of toilet training. Constipation did not have a significant impact on the achievement of bowel control, although the latter could improve the symptoms of constipation. In the future, it may be helpful to carry out prospective studies to confirm these findings, especially in children with active CMPA and children born preterm stratified by gestational age.

References
[1]
DA Kiddoo.
Toilet training children: when to start and how to train.
[2]
N.J. Blum, B. Taubman, N. Nemeth.
Relationship between age at initiation of toilet training and duration of training: a prospective study.
Pediatrics, 111 (2003), pp. 810-814
[3]
S.J. Hodges, K.A. Richards, I. Gorbachinsky, L.S. Krane.
The association of age of toilet training and dysfunctional voiding.
Res Rep Urol, 6 (2014), pp. 127
[4]
M. Colaco, K. Johnson, D. Schneider, J. Barone.
Toilet training method is not related to dysfunctional voiding.
Clin Pediatr (Phila), 52 (2013), pp. 49-53
[5]
N.J. Blum, B. Taubman, N. Nemeth.
Why is toilet training occurring at older ages? A study of factors associated with later training.
J Pediatr, 145 (2004), pp. 107-111
[6]
J.B. Murillo Netto, J. Cristine de Paula, C. Ribeiro Bastos, DG Soares, NCT de Castro, KKDV Sousa, et al.
Personal and familial factors associated with toilet training.
Int Braz J Urol, 47 (2021), pp. 169-177

Previous meeting: This study was accepted for presentation at the XVII Congress of the Sociedad Española de Gastroenterología, Hepatología y Nutrición Pediátrica (SEGHNP, Spanish Society of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition) to be held in Majorca in May 2020. Due to the postponement of the congress, it was instead published in the book of proceedings for the 2020 conference of the SEGHNP, available at: https://www.seghnp.org/documentos/libro-de-trabajos-2020-de-seghnp

Copyright © 2024. Asociación Española de Pediatría
Download PDF
Idiomas
Anales de Pediatría (English Edition)
Article options
Tools
es en

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?