Journal Information
Vol. 101. Issue 5.
Pages 310-318 (1 November 2024)
Visits
704
Vol. 101. Issue 5.
Pages 310-318 (1 November 2024)
Original Article
Full text access
Risk factors and profiles of reattempted suicide in children aged less than 12 years
Factores de riesgo y perfiles del reintento suicida en niños menores de 12 años
Visits
704
César D. Gonzáleza,b,
Corresponding author
, Carlos Fabian Martínez-Cárdenasb,c
a Línea de Ayuda en Salud Mental (Línea Amiga 106), Centro Regulador de Urgencias y Emergencias de Boyacá, Tunja-Boyacá, Colombia
b Programa de posgrado en Neuropsicología y Educación, Fundación Universitaria Internacional de La Rioja, Bogotá, Colombia
c Escuela de Enfermería, Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia, UPTC, Tunja-Boyacá, Colombia
This item has received
Article information
Abstract
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Figures (2)
Tables (3)
Table 1. Sociodemographic characteristics, risk factors and methods used in suicide attempts in children aged less than 12 years in Boyacá.
Table 2. Sociodemographic characteristics, risk factors and methods used in first and repeated suicide attempts in children aged less than 12 years in Boyacá.
Table 3. Bivariate logistic regression model for estimation of risk factors for reattempted suicide in children aged less than 12 years in Boyacá.
Show moreShow less
Abstract
Objective

Suicide attempt (SA) repetition is considered one of the main risk factors for completed suicide. In spite of this, there is no previous research on this variable in children. The objective was to determine the factors and profiles associated with reattempted suicide in children aged less than 12 years.

Methods

Cross-sectional study that included 120 reports (event code INS.356) of SA in children aged less than 12 years between 2018 and 2023 in the SIVIGILA surveillance system of Colombia. We carried out a bivariate logistic regression analysis to generate the best fitting risk factor model and a multiple correspondence analysis (MCA) to establish the possible SA recurrence profiles using the SPSS software, version 26.

Results

Of the 120 cases analysed, 43 (35.8%) were reports of reattempted suicide. The best model for predicting risk factors for repeated SA included child maltreatment (OR, 6.22; P < .05), persistent suicidal ideation (PSI) (OR, 30.91; P < .001), a history of violence or sexual abuse (OR, 13.10; P < .05) and the use of sharp objects (OR, 46.45; P < .001). The MCA identified 3 profiles: “first SA” with poisoning as the attempt method and in absence of PSI, violence and abuse; “one previous SA” with the use of sharp objects and presence of PSI ; “two or more previous SAs” with a history of violence or sexual abuse, child maltreatment and hanging as the method.

Conclusion

Our findings demonstrate the impact of early life adversity (ELA) on children's mental health, so it is necessary to detect and prevent these types of abuse in order to reduce childhood suicide.

Keywords:
Suicide
Suicide attempt
Reattempt
Child behaviour
Adverse childhood experiences
Resumen
Objetivos

La reincidencia del intento suicida se considera uno de los principales factores de riesgo para el suicidio consumado. A pesar de esto, el estudio de esta variable en niños ha sido nulo. El objetivo fue determinar los factores y perfiles asociados con la reincidencia de intento suicida en niños menores de 12 años.

Métodos

Estudio transversal que incluyó 120 casos de intento suicida (código INS.356) de niños menores de 12 años ocurridos entre 2018 y 2023 tomados del reporte epidemiológico del sistema SIVIGILA de Colombia. Los datos fueron analizados por medio de un análisis de regresión logística bivariante para determinar el mejor modelo predictor de factores de riesgo, y se realizó un análisis de correspondencias múltiple para establecer los posibles perfiles de reincidencia usando el software SPSS (V.26).

Resultados

De los 120 casos analizados, 43 (35,8%) reportaron reincidencia de intento suicida. El mejor modelo predictor de factores de riesgo para el reintento suicida fue: maltrato infantil (OR = 6,22; p < 0,05), ideación suicida persistente (OR = 30,91; p < 0,001), historia de violencia oabuso sexual (OR = 13,10; p < 0,05) y el uso de elementos cortopunzantes (OR = 46,45; p < 0,001). El análisis de correspondencias múltiple identificó tres perfiles: “Primer intento suicida” con envenenamiento como método usado y sin la presencia de ideación suicida, violencia o abuso. “Un intento previo” que mostró el uso de elementos cortopunzantes e ideación suicida persistente. “Dos o más intentos previos” que incluyó historia de violencia o abuso sexual, maltrato infantil y ahorcamiento como método empleado.

Conclusiones

Los resultados reportados demuestran el impacto que la adversidad en la vida temprana tiene en la salud mental infantil, por lo que es necesario detectar y prevenir estos tipos de abuso como una forma de reducir la conducta suicida infantil.

Palabras clave:
Suicidio
Intento suicida
Reincidencia
Conducta infantil
Experiencas adversas en la infancia
Full Text
Introduction

Suicide is recognized as a public health problem, contributing to the annual loss of nearly 700 000 lives,1 and is one of the leading causes of death in children and youth.2 In recent years, rather than a decline, we have witnessed an alarming surge in suicide rates among the very young, and in particular in children aged less than 10 years.3 In Colombia, consistent with this global trend, the suicide rate increased from 0.05 deaths by suicide per 100 000 children aged 5–9 years in 2016 to 0.13 in 2019,4 while the suicide attempt (SA) rate increased from 0.33 attempts per 100 000 children in this age group in 2018 to 3.7 attempts in 2023.5

It is also important to take into account the past and future impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the mental health of the young.6 This constitutes a new risk factor associated with suicidal behaviour in children and adolescents. Analysing the changes between pre- and post-pandemic periods can shed light on these repercussions.7

In spite of the above, the study of suicide in the young has historically prioritised adolescence, relegating its study in children to a phenomenon grouped with adolescent suicidal behaviour.8 Few studies have focused on suicidal behaviour in children aged less than 12 years as a specific phenomenon, highlighting the differences and particularities of suicidal behaviour in childhood that warrant further and deeper study of how to approach it.9

On the other hand, recurrent suicidal behaviour has traditionally been reported as one of the most important risk factors for completed suicide in youth,10 so children with a previous history of SAs constitute a particularly high-risk group requiring urgent detection, follow-up and treatment. In spite of this, research on the factors associated with recurrent suicidal behaviour has been scarce,11 and we found no previous studies in the literature that identified the risk factors associated with SA repetition in children under 12 years of age.12 Thus, the objective of our study was to determine the factors and profiles associated with repeated SA between 2018 and 2023 in children under 12 years of age in the department of Boyacá, Colombia.

Material and methodsStudy design and instruments

We conducted an exploratory cross-sectional study through the review of data on SA report records (Event code: INS.356) in the national public health surveillance system of Colombia (Sistema Nacional de Vigilancia en Salud Pública [SIVIGILA]).13 Suicide attempt is a notifiable event and is included in the protocols for important cases in public health in Colombia. The study included all SA reports in children aged less than 12 years of age between 2018 and 2023 for the department of Boyacá, Colombia. We excluded reports with missing or poorly recorded information, which could interfere with the significance of the results, and cases classified as completed suicides.

Suicide attempt reports provide information on the year of the event, sociodemographic variables, history of previous SAs, triggers and risk factors, and the method or substance used in the SA.

Sample

Between 2018 and 2023, a total of 5530 filed reports in Boyacá had the INS.356 code, of which 125 corresponded to children aged less than 12 years. Five reports were excluded due to a lack of minimum trigger or risk factor information or because the information was ambiguous (eg use of all methods in the suicide attempt), so the analysis in the present study included a total of 120 SAs in children. Based on the INS.356 report records, none of the reported cases were classified as completed suicides.

Variables

The INS.356 report is completed by the health care provider that is the first contact in a case of suicide attempt, usually in the emergency department of a hospital or other health care facility. Through an interview with the patient and relatives, the provider establishes the presence or absence of triggers or risk factors. We determined whether a SA was a reattempt by identifying whether it was the first SA or there had been one or more previous attempts.

Reported variables:

  • -

    School-related problems: perceived stress in the school environment (eg bullying, harassment, school failure, etc.).

  • -

    Child maltreatment: Any form of physical, psychological, or sexual maltreatment experienced in the family environment.

  • -

    Family problems: perceived stress within the family environment (eg divorce of parents, conflicts, family dysfunction, etc).

  • -

    Family history of suicide: history of completed suicide in a family member.

  • -

    Persistent suicidal ideation (PSI): continuous thoughts about ending one's own life at the time of assessment in a health care facility.

  • -

    Suicide plan: existence of an organised plan involving a specific method before, during, or after attempting suicide.

  • -

    History of violence or sexual abuse: previous experience of physical or sexual violence in any environment.

  • -

    History of psychiatric disorder: previous diagnosis of a psychiatric disorder, preferably by a psychiatrist, before the suicide attempt. The INS.356 file has four diagnostic options: 1) depression; 2) personality disorder; 3) bipolar disorder; and 4) schizophrenic disorder.

Other reported variables that we coded based on the reviewed data were:

  • -

    Pandemic status: The data were grouped based on the dates when the COVID-19 pandemic began (2020 Mar 6) or ended (2022 Jun 30) in Colombia.14

  • -

    Socioeconomic status: In Colombia, socioeconomic status is stratified on a scale ranging from one to six. A score of less than three is considered low socioeconomic status, while a score of three or more is considered middle or high socioeconomic status.15

Statistical analysis

We calculated absolute frequencies and percentages. Repeated SA was set as the dependent variable, and we used the χ2 test to analyse the association between variables. The statistical analysis was carried out with the software SPSS, version 26.0.

We performed a bivariate logistic regression analysis to determine the model with the highest predictive power of the risk factors associated with recurrent SA and a multiple correspondence analysis (MCA) to determine the profiles of recurrent SA during childhood. The variables included in each of these analyses included were those with a P value of less than 0.20 in the bivariate analysis stage. The variables included in the analysis were: 1) number of SAs, 2) persistent suicidal ideation (PSI), 3) history of violence or sexual abuse, 4) child maltreatment, 5) hanging, 6) sharp objects, and 7) poisoning.

We filed an official request for data retrieval with the SIVIGILA surveillance system of Boyacá, from which we received the anonymized SA reports corresponding to years 2018–2023, thus safeguarding the privacy of children with a history of SA and in adherence with the ethical regulations enshrined in Colombian legislation through Law 1273 of 2009 on data protection, Law 1266 of 2008 on Habeas Data, and Resolution 8430 of 1993 on health research.

Results

A total of 125 cases of SA were reported in children aged less than 12 years between 2018 and 2023. We excluded 5 (4%) based on the exclusion criteria, which left 120 cases for the analysis. Of these, 43 (35.8%) were reports of reattempted suicide, while 77 (64.2%) were reports of first-time SA. Additionally, 40 cases (33%) were reported in the last year, evincing a concerning increase in childhood suicidal behaviour (Table 1).

Table 1.

Sociodemographic characteristics, risk factors and methods used in suicide attempts in children aged less than 12 years in Boyacá.

Variable  n (%) 
  (N = 120) 
Sociodemographic
Year   
2018  12 (10%) 
2019  21 (17.5%) 
2020  12 (10%) 
2021  12 (10%) 
2022  23 (19.2%) 
2023  40 (33.3%) 
Pandemic status
Pre-pandemic  35 (29.2%) 
Pandemic  29 (24.2%) 
Post-pandemic  56 (46.6%) 
Age group   
4–6 years  3 (2.5%) 
7–9 years  38 (31.7%) 
10–11 years  79 (65.8%) 
Sex   
Male  62 (51.7%) 
Female  58 (48.3%) 
Residential setting
Urban  81 (67.5%) 
Rural  39 (32.5%) 
Socioeconomic status
Low  109 (90.8%) 
Middle or high  11 (9.2%) 
Risk factors   
School-related problems
Yes  42 (35%) 
No  78 (65%) 
Child maltreatment
Yes  32 (26.7%) 
No  88 (73.3%) 
Family-related problems
Yes  55 (45.8%) 
No  65 (54.2%) 
Suicide of a family member
Yes  8 (6.7%) 
No  112 (93.3%) 
Persistent suicidal ideation (PSI)
Yes  37 (30.8%) 
No  83 (69.2%) 
Suicide plan   
Yes  12 (10%) 
No  108 (90%) 
History of violence or sexual abuse
Yes  23 (19.2%) 
No  97 (80.8%) 
History of psychiatric disorder
Yes  24 (20%) 
No  96 (80%) 
Methods   
Hanging   
Yes  39 (32.5%) 
No  81 (67.5%) 
Sharp objects
Yes  31 (25.8%) 
No  89 (74.2%) 
Jumping from a height
Yes  14 (11.7%) 
No  106 (88.3%) 
Poisoning   
Yes  41 (34.2%) 
No  79 (65.8%) 
Type of substance
Medicines  26 (63.4%) 
Other  15 (36.6%) 

The variables for which we found a percentage of suicide reattempt greater than 40% (Table 2) were: age 7 to 9 years (44.7%), year 2021 (50%), rural setting (41%), child maltreatment (53.1%), completed suicide in a family member (50%), PSI (56.8%), suicide plan (50%), history of violence or sexual abuse (56.5%), history of psychiatric disorder (45.8%), hanging (46.2%), and use of a sharp object (67.7%). The variables found to be significantly associated were: child abuse (P < .05), PSI (P < .005), history of violence or sexual abuse (P < .05), use of a sharp object (P < .001), and self-poisoning (P < .001). We did not find statistically significant differences based on any sociodemographic variable.

Table 2.

Sociodemographic characteristics, risk factors and methods used in first and repeated suicide attempts in children aged less than 12 years in Boyacá.

Variable  Repeated suicide attempt (n = 43)  No previous attempts (n = 77)  P2
  n (%)  n (%)   
Sociodemographic   
Year       
2018  3 (25%)  9 (75%)  .739
2019  9 (42.9%)  12 (57.1%) 
2020  3 (25%)  9 (75%) 
2021  6 (50%)  6 (50%) 
2022  8 (34.8%)  15 (65.2%) 
2023  14 (35%)  26 (65%) 
Pandemic status       
Pre-pandemic  12 (34.3%)  23 (65.7%)   
Pandemic  11 (37.9%)  18 (62.1%)  .955 
Post-pandemic  20 (35.7%)  36 (64.3%)   
Age group       
4–6 years  1 (33.3%)  2 (66.7%)  .383
7–9 years  17 (44.7%)  21 (55.3%) 
10–11 years  25 (31.6%)  54 (68.4%) 
Sex       
Male  21 (33.9%)  41 (66.1%)  .643
Female  22 (37.9%)  36 (62.1%) 
Residential setting       
Urban  27 (33.3%)  54 (66.7%)  .410
Rural  16 (41%)  23 (59%) 
Socioeconomic status   
Low  39 (35.8%)  70 (64.2%)  .969
Middle or high  4 (36.4%)  7 (63.6%) 
Risk factors   
School-related problems   
Yes  12 (28.6%)  30 (71.4%)  .223
No  31 (39.7%)  47 (60.3%) 
Child maltreatment   
Yes  17 (53.1%)  15 (46.9%)  .017a
No  26 (29.5%)  62 (70.5%) 
Family-related problems       
Yes  19 (34.5%)  36 (65.5%)  .787
No  24 (36.9%)  41 (63.1%) 
Suicide of family member 
Yes  4 (50%)  4 (50%)  .387
No  39 (34.8%)  73 (65.2%) 
Persistent suicidal ideation (PSI) 
Yes  21 (56.8%)  16 (43.2%)  .001b
No  22 (26.5%)  61 (73.5%) 
Suicide Plan       
Yes  6 (50%)  6 (50%)  .281
No  37 (34.3%)  71 (65.7%) 
History of violence or sexual abuse       
Yes  13 (56.5%)  10 (43.5%)  .021a
No  30 (30.9%)  67 (69.1%) 
History of psychiatric disorder       
Yes  11 (45.8%)  13 (54.2%)  .253
No  32 (33.3%)  64 (66.7%) 
Methods   
Hanging   
Yes  18 (46.2%)  21 (53.8%)  .102
No  25 (30.9%)  56 (69.1%) 
Sharp objects       
Yes  21 (67.7%)  10 (32.3%)  .000c
No  22 (24.7%)  67 (75.3%) 
Jumping from a height       
Yes  4 (28.6%)  10 (71.4%)  .547
No  39 (36.8%)  67 (63.2%) 
Poisoning   
Yes  5 (12.2%)  36 (87.8%)  .000c
No  38 (48.1%)  41 (51.9%) 
Type of substance   
Medicines  3 (11.5%)  23 (88.5%)  .866
Other  2 (13.3%)  12 (86.7%) 
a

P < .05.

b

P < .005.

c

P < .001.

In order to identify the risk factors with the strongest association to recurrent SA, we included variables with a P value of less than 0.20 in the analysis of the bivariate logistic regression model. This allowed us to find the best explanatory model with the best fit (Hosmer and Lemeshow Test: P > .05; Cox and Snell R2, 0.458) of the risk factors for recurrent childhood suicidal behaviour (Table 3), which included: child maltreatment (OR, 6.22; P < .05), PSI (OR, 30.91; P < .001), history of violence or sexual abuse (OR, 13.10; P < .05), and use of sharp objects (OR, 46.45; P < .001).

Table 3.

Bivariate logistic regression model for estimation of risk factors for reattempted suicide in children aged less than 12 years in Boyacá.

Variable  Wald  DF  P  Exp(B) odd ratio (OR)  95% CI EXP(B) 
Child maltreatment  1.827  4.108  .043  6.218  1.062−36.398 
Persistent suicidal ideation (PSI)  3.431  12.675  .000  30.912  4.675−204.394 
History of violence or sexual abuse  2.573  6.421  .011  13.100  1.791−95.829 
Sharp objects  3.838  13.107  .000  46.451  5.815−371.073 
Constant  −3.714  17.344  .000  0.024   

*Model: χ2 = 49.008; P < .001; Cox and Snell R2 = 0.458.

** Hosmer-Lemeshow test: χ2 = 17.88; P > .05.

Last of all, the first two dimensions of the MCA explained 57.7% of the variance. Fig. 1 shows the 3 identified profiles, starting with the “first SA” profile, where there was a clear predominance of poisoning as the used method and absence of PSI, violence, abuse and maltreatment. Then there is the “one previous SA” profile, characterised by the use of sharp objects and the presence of PSI. Finally, the “two or more previous SA” profile showed a tendency to use hanging and the presence of a history of violence or sexual abuse and child maltreatment.

Figure 1.

Profiles of the recurrent suicide attempt in children in Boyacá, Colombia, 2018–2023. Variables : violence (history of violence or sexual abuse), persistent suicidal ideation (SI), number (#) of attempts (0: zero previous attempts; 1: one previous attempt; 2: two or more previous attempts), child maltreatment, hanging, poisoning and sharp objects. Answer categories: 0 (no), 1 (yes).

(0.28MB).
Discussion

Suicidal behaviour has been a public health problem requiring extensive effort in its study and prevention, which represents a challenge given its multifactorial aetiology, influenced by various genetic, developmental, neurobiological, personal, and social factors.16 However, the literature on the subject maintains the consensus that a history of previous SAs is a risk factor associated with death by suicide.11,10

Despite this, there have been no studies focusing on the factors leading children aged less than 12 years to carry out more than one SA, and research on the adolescent population has been prioritised,8,11 which is the reason we sought to carry out bivariate and multivariate analyses to identify risk factors and profiles associated with multiple SA in children.

However, before analysing recurrent suicidal behaviour, it is important to consider some general data on childhood suicide attempts. For instance, 46.5% of the attempts occurred in the post-pandemic period (after 2022 Jun 30). Although this variable was not associated with the rate of suicide reattempt, it is important to take it into account. Consistent with previous studies,6,17 this finding illustrates how the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has been a relevant factor associated with the increase in suicidal behaviour among youth.

Additionally, we found no significant differences in any of the sociodemographic variables. Among these variables, sex stands out. Previous studies investigating the gender paradox in suicidal behaviour have not found differences between men and women in recurrent suicidal behaviour.11,18,19 However, this finding has significant implications for understanding the persistence of suicidal behaviour, as it appears to contradict data on suicide attempts and completed suicides in each sex,20 especially in regard to the marked differences between boys and girls during childhood.12

Starting with the frequency of repeated SA in the population under study, we found a rate of 35.8%. Although it was a lower rate compared to previous national studies in the child and adolescent population,21 it is still worrying given the early ages at which SAs occurred, in addition to a higher recurrence of suicidal behaviour in youth compared to other continents,18,22 which makes this concern more pressing and further underscores the need to address and prevent suicidal behaviour in early childhood in developing countries.

Thus, the main risk factors that predicted recurrent suicide attempts in children were child maltreatment (OR, 6.22; P < .05), PSI (OR, 30.91; P < .001), a history of violence or sexual abuse (OR, 13.10; P < .05), and the use of sharp objects (OR, 46.45; P < .001). A previous meta-analysis reported an association with early life adversity (ELA), such as violence, sexual abuse or physical, psychological or sexual maltreatment, which acted as a predictor of suicidal behaviour in childhood,9 and there is also evidence that ELA is related to the development of emotional problems and psychiatric disorders, as well as neurobiological alterations in brain pathways that are important for emotional recognition and regulation.23

In this sense, previous work has shown that the presence of maternal abuse and neglect at three years of age and the presence of mental health symptoms and aggression problems at five years of age considerably increase the risk of presenting suicidal ideation at nine years of age (OR, 3.50).24 The above highlights the consequences of ELA on children’s mental health and evinces the need to carry out preventive strategies against all forms of child maltreatment, abuse or violence to avoid the development of both psychiatric disorders and early suicidal behaviour25 in addition to addressing their treatment to reduce the recurrence of SAs in children.

It is important to mention that while the presence of a previous mental disorder was associated with a higher frequency of repeated SA (45.8%), the differences in this variable were not statistically significant (P > .05). This may be attributed to underreporting, given the limitations in the diagnostic methodology of the INS.356 reporting form, as it would be advisable to improve notification protocols and to investigate the aetiology and role as a mediator of various psychiatric disorders in childhood suicidal behaviour and its recurrence.

The first profile, which we called “first SA” because it was observed in children without a previous history of SA, encompasses cases with poisoning as the method, without PSI or a history of violence or abuse, and, thus, could be explained by indeterminate acts. A previous study that analysed SAs by self-poisoning pointed at factors such as cognitive immaturity and age-related impulsivity as possible contributors to the development of suicidal behaviour,26 but more research is needed in this regard.

The second profile, “one previous SA”, involves the use of sharp objects and the presence of PSI. These features evince an evolution in childhood suicidal behaviour from impulsive acts in the first SA to increasingly elaborate thoughts of death and the use of more lethal methods. Although traditionally there is a generalised belief that children do not really think about death and suicide, recent evidence challenges this preconception and shows that various biopsychosocial factors that affect children’s mental health can give rise to mature conceptions of death and suicide from an early age.23,27,28

The last profile, “two or more previous SAs”, included the use of hanging as the primary method, a history of violence or sexual abuse and child maltreatment, in agreement with previous studies that found hanging was the method associated with the highest risk for completed suicide in this population,29 as well as the relationship of ELA, mainly child maltreatment (OR, 2.62),30 with paediatric suicidal behaviour.31,32

Finally, taking into account that a high proportion of childhood suicidal behaviour is detected and reported in emergency care departments and given that interventions limited to emergency department-based care without continuity of care or follow-up have been found to be insufficient for the prevention of repeated SAs in children,33 strategies that go beyond the individual and integrate family- and community-based interventions are necessary to prevent recurrent suicidal behaviour in youth.34

The main strength of this study was the incorporation of a little-studied dependent variable in childhood suicidal behaviour, recurrence, which can pave the way for further studies focusing on the subject and thus guide the development of better strategies of prevention and intervention in paediatric suicide. This analysis is a first step that may have applicability and external validity in similar sociodemographic contexts.

The limitations of this study were related to the quality and depth of the information analysed; since we used secondary data, there was an evident loss of information on important variables, such as sex and gender expression, and individual factors such as impulsivity.

For several of the variables under study, no standardized approach had been established to verify their presence or absence, including risk factors such as child maltreatment or abuse, so these data depended on the quality of the interview conducted by the reporting professional. Similarly, in the presence of a previous diagnosis of mental health disorder, there was uncertainty as to whether a formal diagnosis had been made and the quality of the diagnosis, aspects that may also limit the recognition of disorders significantly associated with suicidal behaviour in children, such as ADHD or behaviour disorders.

In this sense, it is recommended that future studies address, based on primary data, the variables associated with the recurrence of suicidal behaviour in childhood, such as personality traits (eg impulsivity or aggressiveness), sex, specific mental disorders and different types of violence and abuse.

Conclusion

The study of suicidal behaviour in children aged less than 12 years to date has been scarce, probably due to the general belief that at this age there is no clear thought of death or suicide. However, there is evidence that various factors can give rise to clear desires for death by suicide in children, and that the early paediatric suicidal spectrum is a real problem in which variables such as recurrence have not been sufficiently studied.

The predictors for repeated SA in childhood identified in our study were a history of violence or sexual abuse, child abuse, PSI and the use of sharp objects, which allowed the identification of 3 childhood SA profiles, which were: “first SA” with the method of poisoning and absence of ELA and PSI, followed by “single previous SA” with presence of PSI and use of a sharp object and lastly “2 or more previous SAs” with a previous history of exposure to violence, sexual abuse or child maltreatment and use of more lethal methods, such as hanging. These findings evince the need to intervene in social and family settings in strategies for prevention of recurrent suicidal behaviour in children.

Ethical considerations

The study was based on the review of anonymized data, respecting the ethical standards for health research. The current article does not contain any personal or clinical data.

Acknowledgments

We thank Martín Barrera and Angélica González for their support and guidance and the Public Health Surveillance Department of the Health Care Administration of Boyacá for providing access to the data used in the study.

References
[2]
A.O. Reliford.
Suicide and suicidal behaviors in minoritized youth.
Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am, 62 (2023), pp. 105-145
[3]
C. Palacios.
Suicide behaviour in Colombia.
Rev Colomb Psiquiat, 47 (2018), pp. 139
[4]
Instituto Colombiano de Medicina Legal.
[5]
V. Mosquera.
Instituto Nacional de Salud.
[6]
P. López, P. Pedreira, L. Martínez-Sánchez, J. Cruz, C. de Luna, F. Herrero, et al.
Autolesiones y conducta suicida en niños y adolescentes. Lo que la pandemia nos ha desvelado.
An Pediat, 98 (2023), pp. 204-212
[7]
M. Bersia, E. Koumantakis, P. Berchialla, L. Charrier, A. Ricotti, P. Grimaldi, et al.
Suicide spectrum among young people during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
[8]
L. Mosquera.
Conducta suicida en la infancia: Una revisión crítica.
[9]
R. Soole, K. Kõlves, D. De Leo.
Suicide in children: a systematic review.
Arch Suicide Res, 19 (2015), pp. 285-304
[10]
J. Bilsen.
Suicide and youth: risk factors.
Front Psychiatry, 9 (2018), pp. 540
[11]
L. Morales, H. Hernández-Romero, R. Pacheco, E.S. Castro-Alzate.
Factores relacionados con la reincidencia de intento de suicidio en adolescentes y adultos jóvenes atendidos en una empresa social del estado en Cali del 2016 al 2019.
Rev Colomb Psiquiat, (2023), pp. 1-9
[12]
C. González.
Factores diferenciados según sexo del intento suicida en infantes menores de 11 años en Boyacá, Colombia, entre los años 2018 y 2022.
Rev Colomb Psiquiat, (2024), pp. 1-9
[13]
Sivigila.
Ficha de Notificación Individual INS:356 Intento de Suicidio., (2016),
[14]
Decreto 655/2022. Presidente de la República de Colombia, (2022),
[15]
Ley 142/1994 Por la cual se establece el régimen de los servicios públicos domiciliarios y se dictan otras disposiciones, Congreso de Colombia, (1994),
[16]
G. Turecki, D. Brent, D. Gunnell, R. O’Connor, M. Oquendo, J. Pirkis, et al.
Suicide and suicide risk.
Nat Rev Dis Primers, 5 (2019), pp. 74
[17]
E. Gutiérrez, L. Araújo, L. Rojas-Bernal, C. Rodríguez.
Factores de riesgo asociados al intento e ideación suicida en niños y adolescentes durante la pandemia COVID-19: una revisión sistemática de la literatura y metaanálisis 2020–2022.
Rev Colombi Psiquiat, (2024), pp. 1-12
[18]
X. Alvarez-Subiela, C. Castellano-Tejedor, M. Verge-Muñoz, K. Esnaola-Letemendia, D. Palao-Vidal, F. Villar-Cabeza.
Predictors of suicide re-attempt in a Spanish adolescent population after 12 months’ follow-up.
Int J Environ Res Public Health, 19 (2022), pp. 7566
[19]
L. Alvis, A. Soto, H. Grisales.
El intento de suicidio en Ibagué: el silencio de una voz de auxilio.
[20]
L. Shelef.
The gender paradox: do men differ from women in suicidal behavior?.
J Mens Health, 17 (2021), pp. 22-29
[21]
A. Velásquez-Vélez, M. Medina-Tamayo, I. Pérez-Villegas, N. Trujillo-Orrego.
Factores psicosociales asociados a la reincidencia de intentos de suicidio en pacientes con enfermedad mental atendidos en el Hospital Mental de Antioquia.
Rev Fac Nac Salud Pública, 40 (2022), pp. e01
[22]
F. Villar, C. Castellano-Tejedor, M. Verge, B. Sánchez, T. Blasco-Blasco.
Predictors of suicide behavior relapse in pediatric population.
Span J Psychol, 21 (2018), pp. E6
[23]
M. Wade, L. Wright, K.E. Finegold.
The effects of early life adversity on children’s mental health and cognitive functioning.
Transl Psychiatry, 12 (2022), pp. 244
[24]
E. Paul.
The development of suicidal ideation and self-harm in childhood and adolescence,
[25]
E. Paul, A. Ortin.
Psychopathological mechanisms of early neglect and abuse on suicidal ideation and self-harm in middle childhood.
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry, 28 (2019), pp. 1311-1319
[26]
G. Spagnuolo, D. Alfieri, C. Guidoni, E. Girotto.
Factors associated with the severity of suicide attempts by poisoning in adolescents.
Rev Colomb Psiquiat, (2024), pp. 1-8
[27]
M. Geoffroy, S. Bouchard, M. Per, B. Khoury, E. Chartrand, J. Renaud, et al.
Prevalence of suicidal ideation and self-harm behaviours in children aged 12 years and younger: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Lancet Psychiatry, 9 (2022), pp. 703-714
[28]
M. Covarrubias, R. Soltero, L. Sánchez, M. Rivera, D. Pavón.
Pensamientos de muerte e ideación suicida en niños y niñas mexicanos de 6 a 11 años.
Uaricha Rev Psico, 14 (2017), pp. 20-30
[29]
D. Ruch, K. Heck, A. Sheftall, C. Fontanella, J. Stevens, M. Zhu, et al.
Characteristics and precipitating circumstances of suicide among children aged 5 to 11 years in the United States, 2013–2017.
[30]
R.T. Liu, R.F. Walsh, A.E. Sheehan, S.M. Cheek, C.M. Sanzari.
Prevalence and correlates of suicide and nonsuicidal self-injury in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
JAMA Psychiatry, 79 (2022), pp. 718-726
[31]
R. Finzi, A. Ram, D. Shnit, D. Har-Even, S. Tyano, A. Weizman.
Depressive symptoms and suicidality in physically abused children.
Am J Orthopsychiatry, 71 (2001), pp. 98-107
[32]
L. Itzhaky, I. Gratch, H. Galfalvy, J. Keilp, A. Burke, M. Oquendo, et al.
Psychosocial risk factors and outcomes associated with suicide attempts in childhood: a retrospective study.
J Psychiatr Res, 125 (2020), pp. 129-135
[33]
R. Balasa, S. Lightfoot, K. Cleverley, R. Stremler, P. Szatmari, Z. Alidina, et al.
Effectiveness of emergency department-based and initiated youth suicide prevention interventions: a systematic review.
[34]
B. Mirkovic, D. Cohen, S. Garny de la Rivière, H. Pellerin, J.M. Guilé, A. Consoli, et al.
Repeating a suicide attempt during adolescence: risk and protective factors 12 months after hospitalization.
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry, 29 (2020), pp. 1729-1740
Copyright © 2024. Asociación Española de Pediatría
Download PDF
Idiomas
Anales de Pediatría (English Edition)
Article options
Tools
es en

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?