Información del artículo
El Texto completo está disponible en PDF
Bibliografía
[1.]
N. Mahadevan, M. Pearce, P. Steer.
The proper measure of intrauterine growth retardation is function, not size.
Br J Obstet Gynaecol, 101 (1994), pp. 1032-1035
[2.]
R.L. Goldenberg, S.P. Cliver.
Small for gestational age and intrauterine growth restriction: Definitions and standards.
Clin Obstet Gynecol, 40 (1997), pp. 704-714
[3.]
L. Lubchenco, C.h. Hansman, M. Dresler, E. Boyd.
Intrauterine growth as estimated from liveborn birth weight data 24 to 42 weeks of gestation.
Pediatrics, 32 (1963), pp. 793-800
[4.]
M. Usandizaga, J. Ortiz-Caro, J.A. Celorio, F. Calero, J.I. García Elvira, J.A. Usandizaga.
Definition of intrauterine growth retardation.
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd, 44 (1984), pp. 656-658
[5.]
R. Usher, F. McLean.
Intrauterine growth of live-born Caucasian infants at sea level: Standards obtained from measurements in 7 dimensions of infants born between 25 and 44 weeks of gestation.
J Pediatr, 74 (1969), pp. 901-910
[6.]
J. Morales-Rosello.
Physiologic restriction versus genetic weight potential: Study in normal fetuses and in fetuses with intrauterine growth retardation.
J Ultrasound Med, 18 (1999), pp. 343-347
[7.]
T. Chard.
The myth of fetal growth retardation at term.
Br J Obstet Gynaecol, 100 (1993), pp. 1076-1081
[8.]
P. Danielian, A. Allman, P. Steer.
Is obstetric and neonatal outcome worse in fetuses who fail to reach their growth potential?.
Br J Obstet Gynaecol, 99 (1992), pp. 452-454
[9.]
R.I. Goldenberg, G.R. Cutter, H.J. Hoffman.
Intrauterine growth retardation: Standards for diagnosis.
Am J Obstet Gynecol, 161 (1989), pp. 271-277
Copyright © 2002. Asociación Española de Pediatría
