Journal Information
Vol. 84. Issue 2.
Pages 114-115 (1 February 2016)
Vol. 84. Issue 2.
Pages 114-115 (1 February 2016)
Scientific Letter
Full text access
Acute intermittent porphyria in a paediatric population in the region of Murcia: Phenotype and prevalence
Porfiria aguda intermitente en población pediátrica de la región de Murcia: fenotipo y prevalencia
Visits
7618
M.J. Sánchez-Solera,
Corresponding author
mj.sanchezsoler@gmail.com

Corresponding author.
, M. Barreda-Sánchezb, M.J. Ballesta-Martíneza,c, G. Glóverc,d, E. Guillén-Navarroa,c,e
a Sección Genética Médica, Servicio de Pediatría, Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain
b UCAM-Universidad Católica de Murcia, Murcia, Spain
c CIBERER, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
d Centro de Bioquímica y Genética Clínica, Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, IMIB-Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain
e Cátedra de Genética Médica, UCAM-Universidad Católica de Murcia, Murcia, Spain
This item has received
Article information
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Tables (2)
Table 1. Precipitating drugs.
Table 2. Summary of epidemiologic characteristics, phenotype and genotype of the cases.
Show moreShow less
Full Text
Dear Editor:

Acute intermittent porphyria (AIP; MIM# 176000) is an autosomal dominant genetic disease with incomplete penetrance (10–15%) and variable expression. It is caused by a partial deficiency of the hydroxymethylbilane synthase (HMBS) enzyme resulting from mutations in the HMBS gene. Recently, a prevalence of 6.3 cases per million inhabitants has been reported for Spain,1 but a higher prevalence is estimated for the Region of Murcia due to the founder effect of the c.669_698del mutation.2

It typically manifests as intermittent attacks of abdominal pain accompanied by other gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, neurological and/or psychiatric symptoms, and many precipitating factors are known, such as prolonged fasting or the consumption of alcohol or certain drugs (Table 1).

Table 1.

Precipitating drugs.

Aminoglutethimide  Barbiturates 
Carbamazepine  Chloramphenicol 
Clemastine  Clonidine 
Co-trimoxazole  Danazol 
Dapsone  Dihydralazine 
Dimenhydrinate  Metamizole 
Ergot derivatives  Erythromycin 
Etamsylate  Ethosuximide 
Etomidate  Griseofulvin 
Ketoconazole  Meprobamate 
Methyldopa  Sulphonamides 
Methysergide  Nalidixic acid 
Orphenadrine  Oxcarbazepine 
Tolbutamide  Phenylbutazone 
Phenytoin  Pyrimidone 
Pyrazolone  Pyrazinamide 

The prevalence of AIP in the paediatric population is unknown, symptomatic cases are exceptional, and the reported clinical manifestations are variable. Only one prospective study has been conducted, in Sweden, by Hultdin et al.3; it included 61 patients aged less than 18 years, of whom 10% experienced attacks (all experienced mild abdominal pain).

Although diagnosing AIP in children poses great challenges, this disease should be suspected in patients with nonspecific gastrointestinal, neurological and/or psychiatric manifestations, and should be included in the differential diagnosis of abdominal pain of unknown origin. When suspected, the preferred screening method is the Hoesch test (qualitative detection of PBG in urine), increasingly used in Spain as a result of the launching of the PAGORA project (Acute Porphyria Screening Protocol for patients with unexplained acute abdominal pain in the emergency department), to be followed by specific enzymatic or genetic testing. The management is based on removal of precipitating factors, symptomatic treatment and increased intake of carbohydrates in mild to moderate cases; there is evidence supporting the efficacy of the administration of hemin as haem arginate in severe cases,4 and recently Andreeva et al. have published a note about a research project on the use of genetic therapy in these patients (2014).5

We performed a retrospective review of the medical records of patients aged less than 18 years with a molecular diagnosis of AIP after the positive identification of a family history of AIP (affected parent) during the followup by the medical genetics department. We analysed the prevalence, phenotype and genotype of these cases.

We present the cases of nine patients, with a mean age at diagnosis of 7 years (Table 2). The prevalence is 28 cases per million inhabitants (total population under 18 years in Murcia, 320,698). The mean duration of followup after diagnosis was 23 months (range, 3–40 months), and according to the documentation, none of the patients experienced attacks during the followup. At age 2, case 9 experienced an episode of mild abdominal pain after the molecular diagnosis of AIP, so he was admitted to the hospital and diagnosed with pain of unknown origin (urine PBG was not measured to assess for a possible attack).

Table 2.

Summary of epidemiologic characteristics, phenotype and genotype of the cases.

Case  Age at diagnosis (years)  Sex  Associated anomalies  Affected parent  HMBS gene mutations 
0.5    Father, asymptomatic AIP  c.669_698del 
15    Father, asymptomatic AIP  c.669_698del 
IUGR  Mother, symptomatic AIP  c.669_698del 
1.5  VACTERL association  Father, asymptomatic AIP  c.669_698del 
  Father, asymptomatic AIP  c.669_698del 
12    Father, symptomatic AIP  c.669_698del 
Sideroblastic anaemia and language delay  Father, asymptomatic AIP  c.669_698del 
Language delay  Mother, symptomatic AIP  c.669_698del 
16    Mother, asymptomatic AIP  c.76C>

Four cases (45%) presented with associated abnormalities. Cases 7 and 8 presented with language delay. Case 7 also suffered from sideroblastic anaemia caused by a homozygous c.683G>T mutation in the SLC25A38 gene. Case 5 had multiple congenital anomalies compatible with VACTERL association (imperforate anus with rectovesical fistula, lumbar hemivertebrae, superior vena cava draining into the coronary sinus, polycystic left kidney and left grade 5 vesicoureteral reflux).

Case 4 (history of intrauterine growth restriction [IUGR]; birth weight, 1630g below first percentile) had significant growth retardation at age 3 years (weight and height below first percentile).

The mother of case 4 was diagnosed during pregnancy. She had an acute attack during gestation and required intravenous administration of haem. The child was delivered by emergency C-section due to IUGR and maternal preeclampsia at 36 weeks gestation.

To conclude, the results of our study support the hypothesis that there is a high prevalence of AIP in children in our region due to the founder effect of the c.669_698del mutation: 28 cases per million inhabitants. All patients were asymptomatic at diagnosis and remained so during followup (with a possible unconfirmed attack in case 9), which may be due to the young age of the population under study (7 years). We found a high rate of associated abnormalities (language delay, multiple congenital anomalies, etc.) that had not been reported previously, so additional follow-up studies need to be conducted on larger samples. Attacks during pregnancy could be a risk factor for IUGR in the newborn and hypertension in the mother, but this aspect is still being debated.6

Early diagnosis is essential in order to implement measures to avoid attack-precipitating factors, to address the chronic problems caused by the disease, and to provide adequate counselling to the family.

Acknowledgments

We want to thank the patients and their families for their collaboration. This study was partially funded by the UCAM-Universidad Católica de Murcia (PMAFI/09/14). M. Barreda-Sánchez is a graduate student on a predoctoral fellowship awarded by the same university.

References
[1]
G. Elder, P. Harper, M. Badminton, S. Sandberg, J.C. Deybach.
The incidence of inherited porphyrias in Europe.
J Inherit Metab Dis, 36 (2013), pp. 849-857
[2]
E. Guillén-Navarro, P. Carbonell, G. Glover, M. Sánchez-Solís, A. Fernández-Barreiro.
Novel HMBS founder muttion and significant intronic olymorphism in Spanish patients with acute intermittent porphyria.
Ann Hum Genet, 68 (2004), pp. 509-514
[3]
J. Hultdin, A. Schmauch, A. Wikberg, G. Dahlquist, C. Andersson.
Acute intermittent porphyria in childhood: a population-based study.
Acta Paediatr, 92 (2003), pp. 562-568
[4]
P. Stein, M. Badminton, J. Barth, D. Rees, M.F. Stewart, British and Irish Porphyria Network.
Best practice guidelines on clinical management of acute attacks of porphyria and their complications.
Ann Clin Biochem, 50 (2013), pp. 217-223
[5]
L. Andreeva, J. Holder, A. Mathur, M. Simons, A. Sinusas, T. Fahmy.
Augmenting PBGD expression in the liver as a Novel Gene Therapy for Acute Intermittent Porphyria (AIPgene). European commission project summaries.
Hum Gene Ther Clin Dev, 25 (2014), pp. 61-63
[6]
J.T. Marsden, D.C. Rees.
A retrospective analysis of outcome of pregnancy in patients with acute porphyria.
J Inherit Metab Dis, 33 (2010), pp. 591-596

Please cite this article as: Sánchez-Soler MJ, Barreda-Sánchez M, Ballesta-Martínez MJ, Glóver G, Guillén-Navarro E. Porfiria aguda intermitente en población pediátrica de la región de Murcia: fenotipo y prevalencia. An Pediatr (Barc). 2016;84:114–115.

Copyright © 2015. Asociación Española de Pediatría
Download PDF
Idiomas
Anales de Pediatría (English Edition)
Article options
Tools
es en

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?