Anales de Pediatría (English Edition) Anales de Pediatría (English Edition)
An Pediatr (Barc) 2017;86:20-7 - Vol. 86 Num.1 DOI: 10.1016/j.anpede.2016.03.005
Original Article
Intracranial germ cell tumours: A 21-year review
Tumores germinales intracraneales: revisión de 21 años
María Cormenzana Carpioa,, , Daniel Nehme Álvarezb, Carmen Hernández Marqúesc, Antonio Pérez Martínezd, Alvaro Lassaletta Atienzac, Luis Madero Lópezc
a Centro de Salud Lucero, Madrid, Spain
b Servicio de Neuropediatría, Hospital de General de Villalba, Collado Villalba, Madrid, Spain
c Servicio de Hemato-Oncología Pediátrica, Hospital Infantil Niño Jesús, Madrid, Spain
d Servicio de Hemato-Oncología Pediátrica, Hospital Infantil La Paz, Madrid, Spain
Received 28 December 2015, Accepted 03 March 2016
Abstract
Introduction

Intracranial germ cell tumours are rare in children. They are a heterogeneous group of neoplasms that show different clinical manifestations despite having a common origin.

Patients and methods

A retrospective analysis was carried out on the epidemiological and histological characteristics, clinical manifestations, and outcomes of 20 patients diagnosed with intracranial germ cell tumours in the Niño Jesús Children's Hospital of Madrid from 1994 to 2014.

Results

A total of 20 patients were identified: 14 boys and 6 girls. The mean age was 11.1 years (range 2–18 years). Histological confirmation of the diagnosis was obtained in 95% of the patients. Of the 20 patients, 14 were pure germinoma (70%) and 6 non-seminomatous germ cell tumours (30%). The most frequent locations were pineal (45%) and suprasellar (45%). The most frequent clinical symptoms in pineal tumours at diagnosis were headache and vomiting (77.77%), followed by visual disturbances (44.4%). In suprasellar tumours it was polydipsia and polyuria (100%). At diagnosis, 90% of the patients received radiotherapy, and 55% received chemotherapy combined with radiotherapy. There was a relapse in 4 patients (20%), and 3 of them died. Overall survival was 80%; 85.7% for pure germinomas and 60% for non-seminomatous germ cell tumours.

Conclusions

The most common histological subtype was pure germinoma. Germ cell tumours include heterogeneous disease entities that have a variable prognosis. Thus, an accurate diagnosis is vital for patient counselling and treatment planning.

Resumen
Introducción

Los tumores de células germinales intracraneales son un grupo poco frecuente de tumores en niños. Comprenden un grupo heterogéneo de neoplasias, que aunque comparten un origen común, presentan comportamientos clínicos muy diferentes.

Pacientes y métodos

Análisis retrospectivo de las características epidemiológicas e histológicas, las manifestaciones clínicas y la evolución de 20 pacientes diagnosticados de tumor de células germinales intracraneal en el Hospital Infantil Universitario Niño Jesús de Madrid durante los años 1994-2014.

Resultados

Se obtuvieron 20 pacientes: 14 niños y 6 niñas. La edad media fue de 11,1 años (rango 2-18 años). Se realizó confirmación histológica en el 95% de los pacientes. De los 20 pacientes, 14 fueron germinomas puros (70%) y 6 tumores de células germinales no germinomas (30%). Las localizaciones más frecuentes fueron pineal (45%) y supraselar (45%). Los síntomas más frecuentes en el momento del diagnóstico en los tumores de localización pineal fueron cefalea y vómitos (77,77%), seguido de alteraciones visuales (44,4%), y en los tumores de localización supraselar, polidipsia y poliuria (100%). En el momento del diagnóstico recibieron radioterapia el 90% de los pacientes y quimioterapia asociada a la radioterapia el 55%. Presentaron recaída tumoral 4 pacientes (20%), de los cuales 3 fallecieron. La supervivencia global fue del 80%, siendo un 85,7% para los germinomas y un 60% para los no germinomas.

Conclusión

El tipo histológico más frecuente fue el germinoma. Los tumores de células germinales son un grupo heterogéneo de tumores que conllevan un pronóstico diferente, por lo que un adecuado diagnóstico y estadificación es fundamental para planear el tratamiento.

Keywords
Germ cell tumour, Intracranial, Children, Pure germinoma, Non-seminomatous
Palabras clave
Germinal, Intracraneal, Niños, Germinoma, No germinoma
Introduction

Intracranial (IC) germ cell tumours (GCTs) are a rare and heterogeneous group of tumours found in adolescents and young adults. Their incidence varies widely between geographical regions, and they amount to 2–4% of brain tumours in individuals aged 0–19 years in Europe.1,2

Germ cell tumours arise from primordial germ cells that lodge ectopically in the central nervous system (CSN) during the migration from the yolk sac to the gonadal ridge and may undergo malignant transformation. Different tumours develop based on the degree of differentiation of these germ cells at this point.

Germ cell tumours that arise in the CNS share histological, genetic and clinical characteristics with extracranial GCTs. The World Health Organization (WHO) has divided GCTs into two broad groups: germinomatous and nongerminomatous GCTs (NGGCTs)3,4 based on histology and the presence of tumour markers (Tables 1 and 2). Other classification schemes have divided GCTs into secreting and nonsecreting tumours. Secreting tumours have alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) positivity or beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (BHCG) elevations greater than 50IU/L in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) or any serum BHCG or AFP positivity5,6 (Table 1).

Table 1.

Classification of intracranial germ cell tumours proposed by the WHO.

Germ cell tumours 
Germinoma 
Nongerminomatous germ cell tumours
Embryonal carcinoma
Yolk sac tumour
Choriocarcinoma
Teratoma
Benign teratoma
Immature
Mature
Teratoma with malignant transformation
Mixed germ cell tumour 

From: Louis et al., editors.3

Table 2.

Classification of GCTs based on tumour markers.

Tumour type  Marker
  BHCG  AFP  PLAP  c-Kit 
Pure germinoma  −  −  +/− 
Germinoma (syncytiotrophoblastic)  −  +/− 
Endodermal sinus tumour  −  +/−  − 
Choriocarcinoma  −  +/−  − 
Embryonal carcinoma  −  −  − 
Mixed GCT  +/−  +/−  +/−  +/− 
Mature teratoma  −  −  −  − 
Immature teratoma  +/−  +/−  −  +/− 

AFP, alpha-fetoprotein; BHCG, beta-human chorionic gonadotropin; PLAP, placental alkaline phosphatase.

From: Louis et al., editors.3

The clinical presentation varies based on the location and size of the tumour. The most frequent location is the pineal region, followed by the suprasellar region.7 The most common presenting symptoms are endocrine abnormalities, signs of raised intracranial pressure and visual disturbances.

Accurate staging and histological examination are important factors for the classification of patients into prognostic groups.4,8 Imaging studies cannot differentiate GCTs from other tumours, so diagnosis requires histological confirmation except in cases with elevated levels of tumour markers such as AFP and BHCG.3 Surgical management options are determined by tumour location. Traditionally, these tumours were treated with craniospinal irradiation. In the past two decades, advances in imaging techniques, radiotherapy (RTX) and surgery, and the addition of chemotherapy to treatment protocols have led to a significant improvement in the prognosis of malignant GCTs, and especially germinomas, for which the 10-year overall survival now exceeds 90%.3,9,10

Patients and methodsPatient selection

We conducted a retrospective study of patients that received a diagnosis of IC GCT at the Department of Oncology of the Hospital Universitario Infantil Niño Jesús of Madrid between 1994 and 2014. The inclusion criteria were: (a) patients aged 18 years or less and (b) with a diagnosis of IC GCT based on the WHO classification.3 We identified 20 such patients.

We collected data for the following variables: age, sex, tumour location, symptoms at the time of diagnosis and their duration, presence of leptomeningeal metastasis, histology, tumour markers in blood and/or CSF, type of surgery performed and its complications, type of chemotherapy (CTX) and/or RTX administered and their complications, tumour recurrence, and abnormalities during long-term followup (Table 3).

Table 3.

Characteristics of patients with intracranial germ cell tumours.

Patient  Sex  Age (years)  Year of diagnosis  Diagnosis  Location  AFP  BHCG  Metastasis  Recurrence  OS (months) 
12  1994  Germinoma  Pineal  N  No  Yes  57 
13  1995  Germinoma  Pineal  N  No  Yes  60 
2008  Mixed GCT  Suprasellar    No  No  85 
18  1997  Germinoma  Pineal  No  No  71 
11  2000  Germinoma  Suprasellar  No  No  107 
15  1998  Mixed GCT  Pineal  ↑  No  Yes  15 
17  2004  Germinoma  Multifocal  No  No  101 
1995  Mixed GCT  Pineal  ↑  No  No 
2004  Germinoma  Basal ganglia  No  No  76 
10  11  2007  Germinoma  Suprasellar  No  No  62 
11  10  2010  Germinoma  Pineal  No  No  78 
12  2000  Yolk sac tumour  Pineal  ↑  ↑  No  No  12 
13  16  2008  Germinoma  Suprasellar  No  No  57 
14  12  2008  Germinoma  Suprasellar  Yes  No  57 
15  2010  Germinoma  Pineal  No  No  59 
16  10  2010  Mixed GCT  Suprasellar  No  Yes  58 
17  11  2012  Germinoma  Suprasellar  No  No  28 
18  2006  Germinoma  Suprasellar  No  No  15 
19  16  2013  Germinoma  Pineal  No  No  18 
20  11  2002  Mixed GCT  Suprasellar  ↑  ↑  No  No  15 

AFP, alpha-fetoprotein; BHCG, beta-human chorionic gonadotropin; F, female; GCT, germ cell tumour; M, male; OS, overall survival.

Diagnosis

The diagnosis of IC GCT was based on tumour biopsy, levels of AFP and BHCG in serum and CSF, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). A craniospinal MRI and examination of CSF were performed in all patients to assess for the presence of leptomeningeal metastasis. The diagnosis of NGGCT was considered in cases with histological confirmation and/or elevated levels of AFT in serum or of more than 25ng/mL in CSF and/or levels of BHCG greater than 50UI/L. All patients underwent an evaluation of pituitary-hypothalamic function at the time of diagnosis.

TreatmentSurgery

Eighteen patients underwent some type of neurosurgical intervention for collection of a sample for histological confirmation. Six patients underwent an endoscopic biopsy (one transphenoidal biopsy and five through right-frontal drilling guided by a neuronavigation system), and twelve patients underwent partial resection (six occipital, three frontal and two peritoneal craniotomies, with the surgical approach unknown in the remaining patient). Eleven patients had hydrocephalus at the time of diagnosis, and eight underwent ventriculoperitoneal shunting (VPS).

Chemotherapy

Patients underwent several CTX regimens based on cisplatin. Different protocols were used: UK CCSG (BEP),11 Société Française d’Oncologie Pédiatrique (SFOP),12 Children Oncology Group (COG), Pediatric Blood Cancer 200713 and SIOP CNS CGT 2003. Table 4 shows the administered drugs and their doses.

Table 4.

Treatment received by patients.

Type of tumour  Administered treatmentN patients 
GerminomasRadiotherapyWhole-brain 
Ventricular 
Craniospinal 
Unknown 
 
Chemotherapy+radiotherapyUK CCSG (BEP)a 
SFOPb 
COGc 
 
NGGCTChemotherapyUK CCSG (BEP)a  1e 
SFOPb  1f 
Chemotherapy prior to radiotherapy  SIOP CNS CGT 2003d 

From: Einhorn and Donohue,11 Bouffet et al.12 and Kretschmar et al.13

a

UK CCSG (BEP): cisplatin (100mg/m2, day 1), etoposide (120mg/m2/day, days 1–3) and bleomycin (15mg/m2, day 2).11

b

Société Française d’Oncologie Pédiatrique: cycles 1 and 3: carboplatin (600mg/m2, day 1); etoposide (150mg/m2/day, days 1–3), cycles 2 and 4: ifosfamide (1.8g/m2/day, days 21–25) and etoposide (150mg/m2/day, days 21–23). Administration of radiotherapy after 4 cycles of chemotherapy.12

c

Children Oncology Group, Pediatric Blood Cancer 2007: cycle A: etoposide (100mg/m2/day, days 1–5) and cisplatin (20mg/m2/day, days 1–5). Cycle B: cyclophosphamide (1g/m2/day, days 1 and 2) and vincristine (1.5mg/m2/day, days 1, 8 and 15).13

d

SIOP CNS CGT 2003: PEI: cisplatin (20mg/m2/day, days 1–5), etoposide (100mg/m2/day, days 1–3), ifosfamide (1.500mg/m2/day, days 1–5).

e

Did not receive radiotherapy due to a Glasgow coma score of 5 in the context of acute subdural haematoma.

f

Died due to disease progression on day 3 of the first cycle of chemotherapy.

Radiotherapy

Eighteen patients received RTX (four at the Hospital Puerta de Hierro of Madrid, 11 at the Hospital Gregorio Marañón of Madrid and 3 three in other facilities). They were treated with different RTX modalities: two with whole-brain RTX (dose, 30 and 34Gy respectively), seven with ventricular RTX (dose, 30–45Gy) and five with craniospinal RTX (dose, 23.4–30Gy). All of these patients received a boost to the tumour bed (21–59.4Gy). Three patients received only focal irradiation of the tumour (dose, 30.6–54Gy). One patient had yet to initiate RTX at the time of the analysis.

Statistical analysis

We defined overall survival as the time elapsed from diagnosis to the time of death due to all causes or the last follow-up visit. We calculated overall survival using the Kaplan–Meier method. We used the log-rank test to compare overall survival between different histological subtypes (pure germinoma compared to NGGCT). We set the baseline time point at the date of surgery for all patients.

Results

Between 1994 and 2014, 438 patients received a diagnosis of malignant intracranial tumour, of which 20 corresponded to IC GCTs.

The mean age at diagnosis was 11.1 years (range, 2–18 years). The incidence peaked at different ages for different histological subtypes, and we found a difference between germinomas (mean age, 12.21 years) and NGGCTs (mean age, 8.5 years). The final sample consisted of fourteen male patients and six female patients, with a higher prevalence in the male sex (2.3:1).

We classified the identified cases of IC GCT using the scheme proposed by the WHO.3 The most frequent histological subtype was germinoma (Table 5).

Table 5.

Histological subtypes found, based on the classification of germ cell tumours proposed by the WHO.

Germ cell tumours  N patients 
Germinomas  14  70 
Nongerminomatous GCT
Embryonal carcinoma  –  – 
Yolk sac tumour 
Choriocarcinoma  –  – 
Benign teratoma  –  – 
With malignant transformation  –  – 
Mixed germ cell tumours  20 
Othera 
  20  100 
a

Secreting NGGCT, no biopsy.

We found elevated levels of AFP above 25ng/mL in blood or in CSF in four patients (two with mixed GCTs, one with a yolk sac tumour, and one with a secreting NGGCT for which a biopsy was not obtained) and levels of BHCG greater than 50UI/L in three out of 18 patients (one with a mixed GCT, one with a yolk sac tumour and one with a secreting NGGCT for which a biopsy was not obtained).

The location of the tumour was pineal in nine patients (45%), suprasellar in nine patients (45%), the basal ganglia and thalamus in one patient (5%) and multifocal in one other (5%).

Of all pineal tumours, 77.7% occurred in male patients. In female patients, the most frequent location was the suprasellar region (66.6%).

The median time elapsed from the onset of symptoms to diagnosis was 5 months (range, 0.1–27 months).

The most frequent symptoms at the time of diagnosis in pineal tumours were headache and vomiting (77.7%), followed by visual disturbances (44.44%): diplopia, Parinaud syndrome and erratic eye movements. The most common symptoms in patients with suprasellar tumours were polydipsia and polyuria (100%).

Of the patients with suprasellar tumours, 55.5% presented with other endocrine abnormalities at the time of diagnosis, the most frequent of which were hypothyroidism (55.5%), growth hormone deficiency (11.1%) and early puberty (22.2%).

The tumour located in the basal ganglia started with left hemiparesis, which was interpreted as ischaemic stroke on the initial MRI. The patient was a heterozygous carrier of mutation 20201 in the prothrombin gene and had abnormal levels of lipoprotein A, both of which can cause stroke in children. The patient was managed with antiplatelet therapy and follow-up care. A follow-up MRI performed seven months later detected an increase in the size of the lesion compatible with a neuroectodermal tumour, which led to performance of a biopsy.

Of all patients with suprasellar tumours, 44.4% had previously received a diagnosis of idiopathic central diabetes insipidus (DI) because the findings of the initial cranial MRI were not conclusive for diagnosing a GCT. The mean time elapsed until subsequent MRI scans detected the presence of a GCT was 21 months (range, 15–24 months).

The diagnosis was confirmed histologically in 95% of patients. The only case in which a histological assessment was not performed corresponded to a patient with a pituitary tumour that had elevated AFP and BHCG levels. In one patient, histological confirmation was not obtained at diagnosis, but was obtained when the tumour recurred.

There were no complications from the surgery in 77.7% of the patients. One patient developed an epidural haematoma following VPS that required drainage, two patients developed pneumoencephaly that resolved favourably, and one patient developed an occipital pseudomeningocoele that required drainage. There were no surgery-related deaths.

Only one patient (5%) presented with leptomeningeal spread with presence of tumour cells in the CSF at the time of diagnosis.

After the initial diagnosis, 90% of patients received RTX and 55% RTX combined with CTX. Sixty-six percent of patients tolerated RTX well. The adverse effects associated with RTX were: skin toxicity (n=1), grade 2 haematologic toxicity (n=1), grade 1 vomiting (n=1) and post-radiotherapy somnolence syndrome with headache, asthenia and somnolence that required treatment with dexamethasone (n=2).

The initial treatment included CTX in 12 patients. A total of 41 cycles of CTX were administered. The complications associated with CTX were haematologic toxicity (grades 3 and 4; n=4), gastrointestinal toxicity (grades 3 and 4; n=3), febrile neutropaenia with no documented microbial agent (n=2) and one episode of hyponatraemic seizure secondary to DI decompensation due to overhydration during the administration of CTX.

Table 4 summarises the treatments administered after histological confirmation.

Four patients (20%) experienced relapse. Three of these patients died, and the fourth one continues in full remission after autologous stem cell transplantation. At the time of relapse, all of these patients had leptomeningeal disease and presented with clinically significant symptoms (anorexia, pain and difficulty relaxing the lower extremities, hemiparesis, lumbar pain, speech impairments and bradypsychia). In one of the four patients, the relapse occurred outside the radiation field.

The mean time to relapse was 49 months in patients with germinoma and 12.5 months in patients with NGGCTs. All relapsed patients underwent autologous stem cell transplantation following salvage CTX.

The overall survival was 84% (85.7% for patients with germinoma and 60% for patients with NGGCT), with a median duration of followup of 58 months (range, 1.43–106.9 months) (Fig. 1).

Figure 1.
(0.08MB).

Overall survival of paediatric patients with GCT, comparing germinomas and nongerminomatous germ cell tumours (NGGCTs).

One patient with a yolk sac tumour was lost to followup at 12 months from diagnosis due to transfer to another unit. Table 6 shows the data for deceased patients.

Table 6.

Deceased patients.

Diagnosis  Location  Year of diagnosis  Initial treatment  Recurrence with leptomeningeal metastasis  Cause of death 
Germinoma  Pineal  1994  Biopsy+RTX  Yes  Septic shock and haemorrhage day+12 autologous transplant 
Germinoma  Pineal  1995  Partial resection+RTX  Yes  Tumour progression 
Mixed germ cell tumour  Pineal  1998  Partial resection+RTX+CTX  Yes  Tumour progression 
Mixed germ cell tumour  Pineal  2003  CTX  No  Tumour progression on day 3 of the first CTX cycle 

CTX, chemotherapy; RTX, radiotherapy.

The side effects associated with the disease and the treatment observed during long-term followup were: hypothalamic-pituitary hormone imbalances that required hormone replacement therapy (45%), difficulty concentrating and memory impairment (20%), chronic kidney disease (10%), papillary thyroid carcinoma (5%) and bitemporal hemianopsia (5%).

Discussion

Intracranial GCTs are rare in children. In our study, they amounted to 4.5% of all malignant intracranial tumours diagnosed between 1994 and 2004 at the Hospital Niño Jesús. This percentage is similar to those reported by other case series in the United States and Europe.4

The prevalence is higher in males,14–16 a predominance that is even more marked in NGGCTs.14,17 The most frequent tumour locations are pineal and suprasellar.7 In our series, consistent with the literature,14,18 suprasellar locations predominated in female patients.

Tumours in the basal ganglia are rare, corresponding to 4–15% of patients with IC GCTs, but it is worth discussing them due to their clinical characteristics and the challenges they pose to diagnosis. Hemiparesis is the most frequent symptom.1,19 In our series, one patient with a tumour located in the basal ganglia had onset with left hemiparesis, which was interpreted based on the findings of the initial MRI as a stroke due to the characteristics of the patient (carrier of a mutation in the prothrombin gene and abnormal lipoprotein A levels). Follow-up imaging detected the tumour and led to diagnosis.

The symptoms in our series were similar to those described by other authors. Pineal tumours usually present with symptoms of raised intracranial pressure.7,15 Ophthalmological abnormalities are found in 25–50% of patients, and Parinaud syndrome in up to 72.4%.4,7,15 We must make a point of including pineal tumours in the differential diagnosis of patients presenting with symptoms of raised intracranial pressure or ocular symptoms.

Suprasellar tumours usually present with DI, delayed sexual development, hypothyroidism and early puberty.15,20,21 They may also present with ophthalmological abnormalities. In our series, 44.4% of patients with suprasellar GCTs received an initial diagnosis of idiopathic central DI because the tumour was not detectable in the initial MRI. In these patients, the mean time elapsed from the onset of symptoms with normal MRI findings to the evidence of suprasellar tumour in MRI was 21 months, which was consistent with previous reports in the literature.7,22,23 Patients with IC GCTs frequently have endocrine symptoms that may last for a long time before the tumour can be verified by imaging. The possibility of a GCT should be considered in patients presenting with symptoms of endocrinopathy, and these patients should undergo imaging tests periodically, as delayed diagnosis increases the risk of disseminated disease.24

In our series, similar to what other studies have reported,5 45% of patients needed hormone replacement therapy after completing treatment, which requires long-term endocrine followup.

Germ cell tumours can be divided into two broad categories: germinomas and nongerminomatous germ cell tumours. Germinomas account for approximately 50–70% of GCTs.4,20 This distinction is very relevant in clinical practice, as histological subtype is the most significant isolated prognostic factor in IC GCTs.7,14,16

Different authors have proposed the therapeutic classification of IC GCTs based on histology15,25 categorising IC GCTs as having a good, intermediate, or poor prognosis (Table 7).

Table 7.

Therapeutic classification of intracranial germ cell tumours.

Group with good prognosis 
Pure germinoma 
Mature teratoma 
 
Group with intermediate prognosis 
Germinoma with syncytiotrophoblastic giant cells 
Immature teratoma 
Teratoma with malignant transformation 
Mixed tumours mainly composed of germinoma or teratoma 
 
Group with poor prognosis 
Choriocarcinoma 
Yolk sac tumour 
Embryonal carcinoma 
Mixed tumours mainly composed of choriocarcinoma, yolk sac tumour, or embryonal carcinoma. 

Source: Matsutani et al.15

Germinomas are extremely sensitive to CTX and radiation. In the past 20 years, craniospinal irradiation has been the gold standard of treatment and has achieved 5-year survival rates of more than 90%.4,6,10,26 However, this approach is associated with adverse effects on the CNS, thyroid function and growth and development.5,27–29 In patients with NGGCTs, despite the use of intensified CTX and high-dose RTX, 10-year survival continues to be as low as 30–80%.22,23,30 Currently, multicentric clinical trials (International Society of Pediatric Oncology CTG phase ii) are underway that aim at determining the minimum dose and radiation volume that can be administered without jeopardising survival in localised germinomas4,14,15 and, for NGGCT, the dosages needed improve survival in high-risk patients by intensifying treatment, especially in children that receive the diagnosis at age less than 6 years and patients with AFP levels greater than 1000ng/mL.

In our series, the survival in the germinoma group was lower than that reported in the literature. Two out of fourteen patients with pure germinoma died, but we ought to highlight that these patients received the diagnosis in 1994 and 1995, respectively. None of the patients that received a diagnosis of germinoma between 1996 and 2014 died. In our study, the difference in overall survival between patients with germinoma and patients with NGGCT was not statistically significant, but this was probably due to the small sample size.

In our sample, the diagnosis was confirmed histologically in 95% of patients. The only case in which histological assessment was not performed corresponded to a patient with a pituitary tumour that had elevated AFP and BHCG levels. Given the prognosis of this group of tumours, making an accurate diagnosis with histological confirmation is essential to plan an appropriate treatment strategy. Neuroimaging tests cannot differentiate GCTs from other tumours, and therefore diagnosis requires histological confirmation7 except in cases in which there is elevation of tumour markers.

In the past, the risks associated with surgery led to the use of therapeutic irradiation trials to confirm the diagnosis of germinoma. At present, advances in neurosurgical technique have made resection of pineal tumours much safer, with a mortality rate of less than 5%.15,31

Given the favourable response of germinomas to combined CTX and RTX, the extent of resection in these cases is limited by the preservation of visual and neuroendocrine function.5 However, more aggressive approaches have a greater impact on NGGCTs, and higher survival rates have been reported in patients that have undergone radical surgery.5,15,32 In cases of mature teratoma, extended resection is usually curative.

Accurate staging is essential for treatment planning.4,33 There is no universally accepted staging system for germinoma, and most researchers use the TNM system used for medulloblastomas.23 The following workup should be performed in all patients for diagnosis: craniospinal MRI, measurement of AFP and BHCG in serum and CSF, lumbar puncture for CSF cytology, evaluation of pituitary function, visual field test and neuropsychological evaluation.4,5,34

In our study, we found relapses in two out of the fourteen patients with germinoma (14.2%). Both had been treated with whole-brain RTX with boosts of the tumour bed. In patients with NGGCT, the relapse rate was 33.3%. The mean time to relapse was 49 months in patients with germinoma and 12.5 months in patients with NGGCT. Previous studies have reported relapse rates of 10% for germinomas5,35 and of up to 55.7% for NGGCTs.15 The mean time elapsed to relapse in germinomas ranges between 30 and 50 months.1,36 Late relapses after 8–15 years are not uncommon, so patients need to remain under observation for a period of at least 10 years.1

In the four patients that relapsed in our series, the recurrence occurred with leptomeningeal spread. According to the literature, the most common type of relapse in IC GCTs is local recurrence at the primary site, but leptomeningeal spread is found in 30%. The prognosis of relapsing patients, especially of those with NGGCT, continues to be poor.4,37 Salvage treatment includes CTX, RTX and myeloablative CTX with autologous stem cell transplantation.38,39

Conclusion

Intracranial germ cell tumours are a heterogeneous group of tumours that have different prognoses, and therefore accurate diagnosis and staging is essential for treatment planning. Since the number of patients that recover from these tumours is increasing over time, we should identify low-risk patients in whom treatment could be minimised to reduce its impact on the quality of life of survivors without jeopardising long-term survival, and intensify treatment in high-risk groups to achieve a higher rate of recovery.1,5

Conflicts of interest

The authors have no conflict of interests to declare.

References
1
J. Kim,J. Park
Understanding the treatment strategies of intracranial germ cell tumors: focusing on radiotherapy
J Korean Neurosurg Soc, 57 (2015), pp. 315-322 http://dx.doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2015.57.5.315
2
D. Keene,D. Johnston,D. Strother,C. Fryer,A. Carret,B. Crooks
Epidemiological survey of central nervous system germ cell tumors in Canadian children
J Neurooncol, 82 (2007), pp. 289-295 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11060-006-9282-2
3
WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system, 3rd ed., pp. 197-204
4
M. Echevarría,J. Fangusaro,S. Goldman
Pediatric central nervous system germ cell tumors: a review
5
C. Balmaceda,J. Finlay
Current advances in the diagnosis and management of intracranial germ cell tumors
Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep, 4 (2004), pp. 253-262
6
G. Calaminus,M. Bamberg,M.C. Baranzelli,Y. Benoit,L.C. di Montezemolo,F. Fossati-Bellani
Intracranial germ cell tumors: a comprehensive update of the European data
Neuropediatrics, 25 (1994), pp. 26-32 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-2008-1071577
7
R. Packer,B. Cohen,K. Coney
Intracranial germ cell tumors
Oncologist, 5 (2000), pp. 312-320
8
B.G. Fuller,D.S. Kapp,R. Cox
Radiation therapy of pineal region tumors: 25 new cases and a review of 208 previously reported cases
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 28 (1994), pp. 229-245
9
S.J. Huh,K.H. Shin,I.H. Kim,Y.C. Ahn,S.W. Ha,C.I. Park
Radiotherapy of intracranial germinomas
Radiother Oncol, 38 (1996), pp. 19-23
10
A. Maity,H.K. Shu,A. Janss,J.B. Belasco,L. Rorke,P.C. Phillips
Craniospinal irradiation in the treatment of biopsy-proven intracranial germinomas: twenty-five years’ experience in a single center
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 58 (2004), pp. 1165-1170 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2003.08.028
11
L.H. Einhorn,J.P. Donohue
Chemotherapy for disseminated testicular cancer
Urol Clin North Am, 4 (1977), pp. 407-426
12
E. Bouffet,M.C. Baranzelli,C. Patte,M. Portas,C. Edan,P. Chastagner
Combined treatment modality for intracranial germinomas: results of a multicenter SFOP experience. Societé Francaise d’Oncologie Pédiatrique
Br J Cancer, 79 (1999), pp. 1199-1204 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6690192
13
C. Kretschmar,L. Kleinberg,M. Greenberg,P. Burger,E. Holmes,M. Wharam
Pre-radiation chemotherapy with response-based radiation therapy in children with central nervous system germ cell tumors: a report from the Children's Oncology Group
Pediatr Blood Cancer, 48 (2007), pp. 285-291 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pbc.20815
14
C. Chung,B. Owler,M. Dexter,R. Chaseling
Pediatric germ cell tumours of the central nervous system: results and experience from a tertiary-referral pediatric institution in Australia
J Clin Neurosci, 20 (2013), pp. 514-519 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2012.04.017
15
M. Matsutani,K. Sano,K. Takakura,T. Fujimaki,O. Nakamura,N. Funata
Primary intracranial germ cell tumors: a clinical analysis of 153 histologically verified cases
J Neurosurg, 86 (1997), pp. 446-455 http://dx.doi.org/10.3171/jns.1997.86.3.0446
16
H.J. Hoffman,H. Otsubo,E.B. Hendrick,R.P. Humphreys,J.M. Drake,L.E. Becker
Intracranial germ-cell tumors in children
J Neurosurg, 74 (1991), pp. 545-551 http://dx.doi.org/10.3171/jns.1991.74.4.0545
17
D.S. Russell,L.J. Rubenstein
Pathology of tumors of the nervous system
Williams and Wilkins, (1984)
18
T. Jaing,H. Wang,I. Hung,C. Tseng,C. Yang,P. Hung
Intracranial germ cell tumors: a retrospective study of 44 children
Pediatr Neurol, 26 (2002), pp. 369-373
19
J.H. Phi,B.K. Cho,S.K. Kim,J.C. Paeng,I.O. Kim,I.H. Kim
Germinomas in the basal ganglia: magnetic resonance imaging classification and the prognosis
J Neurooncol, 99 (2010), pp. 227-236 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11060-010-0119-7
20
M.T. Jennings,R. Gelman,F. Hochberg
Intracranial germ-cell tumors: natural history and pathogenesis
J Neurosurg, 63 (1985), pp. 155-167 http://dx.doi.org/10.3171/jns.1985.63.2.0155
21
A. Legido,R.J. Packer,L.N. Sutton,G. D’Angio,L.B. Rorike,D.A. Bruce
Suprasellar germinomas in childhood: a reappraisal
Cancer, 63 (1989), pp. 340-344
22
T. Jorsal,M. Rorth
Intracranial germ cell tumors. A review with special reference to endocrine manifestations
23
J.C. Allen
Controversies in the management of intracranial germ-cell tumors
Neurol Clin, 9 (1991), pp. 441-452
24
R.V. Sethi,R. Marino,A. Niemierko,N.J. Tarbell,T.I. Yock,S.M. MacDonald
Delayed diagnosis in children with intracranial germ cell tumors
J Pediatr, 163 (2013), pp. 1448-1453 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2013.06.024
25
Y. Sawamura,J. Ikeda,H. Shirato,M. Tada,H. Abe
Germ cell tumors of the central nervous system: treatments considerations bases on 111 cases and their long-term clinical outcome
Eur J Cancer, 34 (1998), pp. 104-110
26
S.J. Huh,K.H. Shin,I.H. Kim,Y.C. Ahn,S.W. Ha,C.I. Park
Raddiotheraphy of intracranial germinomas
Radiother Oncol, 38 (1996), pp. 19-23
27
M. Schmugge,E. Boltshauser,H.J. Pluss,F.K. Niggli
Long-term follow up and residual sequelae after treatment for intracerebral germ-cell tumor in children and adolescents
Ann Oncol, 11 (2000), pp. 527-533
28
S.J. Rogers,M.A. Mosleh-Shirazi,F.H. Saran
Radiotherapy of localized intracranial germinoma: time to sever historical ties
Lancet Oncol, 6 (2005), pp. 509-519 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(05)70245-X
29
B.J. Spiegler,E. Bouffet,M.L. Greenberg,J.T. Rutka,D.J. Mabbott
Change in neurocognitive functioning after treatment with cranial radiation in childhood
J Clin Oncol, 22 (2004), pp. 706-713 http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2004.05.186
30
B. Cho,K. Wang,S. Kim,S. Shin,J. Chi,B. Cho
Pediatric brain tumors: statistics of SNUH Korea (1959–2000)
Chlid Nerv Syst, 18 (2002), pp. 30-37
31
S. Luo,D. Li,M. Zhang,Z.C. Wang
Occipital transtentorial approach for removal of pineal region tumors. Report of 64 consecutive cases
Surg Neuro, 32 (1989), pp. 36-39
32
C. Balmaceda,G. Heller,R. Rosenblum,B. Diez,J.G. Villablanca,S. Kellie
Chemotherapy without irradiation — a novel approach for newly diagnosed central nervous system germ cell tumors: results of an international cooperative trial
J Clin Oncol, 14 (1996), pp. 2098-2915 http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/jco.1996.14.7.2098
33
J. Yoshida,K. Sugita,T. Kobayashi,K. Takakura,N. Shitara,M. Matsutani
Prognosis of intracranial germ cell tumors: effectiveness of chemotherapy with cisplatin and etoposide (CDDP and VP-16)
Acta Neurochir, 120 (1993), pp. 11-117
34
B.S. Hooda,J.L. Finlay
Recent advances in the diagnoses and treatment of central nervous system germ-cell tumors
Curr Opin Neurol, 12 (1999), pp. 693-696
35
M.J. Dattoli,J. Newall
Radiation therapy for intracranial germinoma: the case for limited volume treatment
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 19 (1990), pp. 433
36
Y. Kamoshima,Y. Sawamura,J. Ikeda,H. Shirato,H. Aoyama
Late recurrence and salvage therapy of CNS germinomas
J Neurooncol, 90 (2008), pp. 205-211 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11060-008-9649-7
37
S. Modak,S. Gardner,I.J. Dunkel,C. Balmaceda,M.K. Rosenblum,D.C. Miller
Thiotepa-based-high-dose-chemotherapy with autologous stem-cell rescue in patients with recurrent or progressive CNS germ cell tumors
J Clin Oncol, 22 (2004), pp. 1934-1943 http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2004.11.053
38
J. Beyer,A. Kramar,R. Mandanas,W. Linkesch,A. Greinix,J.P. Drop
High-dose chemotherapy as salvage treatment in germ cell tumors: a multivariate analysis of prognostic variables
J Clin Oncol, 14 (1996), pp. 2638-2645 http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/jco.1996.14.10.2638
39
W. Siegert,J. Beyer,I. Strohscheer,H. Baurmann,H. Oettle,J. Zingsem
High-dose treatment with carboplatin, etoposide, and ifosfamide followed by autologous stem-cell transplantation in relapsed or refractory germ cell cancer: a phase I/II study. The German Testicular Cancer Cooperative Study Group
J Clin Oncol, 12 (1994), pp. 1223-1231 http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/jco.1994.12.6.1223

Please cite this article as: Cormenzana Carpio M, Nehme Álvarez D, Hernández Marqúes C, Pérez Martínez A, Lassaletta Atienza A, Madero López L. Tumores germinales intracraneales: revisión de 21 años. An Pediatr (Barc). 2017;86:20–27.

Corresponding author. (María Cormenzana Carpio maria.cormenzana@gmail.com)
Copyright © 2015. Asociación Española de Pediatría
An Pediatr (Barc) 2017;86:20-7 - Vol. 86 Num.1 DOI: 10.1016/j.anpede.2016.03.005
X
Cookies Policy

Utilizamos cookies propias y de terceros para mejorar nuestros servicios y mostrarle publicidad relacionada con sus preferencias mediante el análisis de sus hábitos de navegación. Si continua navegando, consideramos que acepta su uso. Puede cambiar la configuración u obtener más información aquí.