Budget impact and cost-utility analysis of universal infant rotavirus vaccination in Spain
Introduction
Rotavirus is a major cause of acute gastroenteritis in children worldwide (CDC, 2011). Although deaths due to rotavirus occur mostly in less-developed countries (Parashar et al., 2009), a substantial burden of Rotavirus Gastroenteritis (RVGE) has been reported in European countries (Giaquinto et al., 2007). In Spain, RVGE entails important morbidity and considerable resource utilization across all health care settings, as well as for families of patients and their employers (Diez-Domingo et al., 2010). It has been estimated that 181,626 episodes of acute gastroenteritis occur per year among children under 5 years of age in Spain (Díez-Domingo et al., 2010), which translates into 14,342 hospitalizations, 41,701 emergency department visits and 48,320 primary care visits with important implications for families, and society as a whole. Spanish parents miss, on average, 4.6 workdays when their child is hospitalized due to a rotavirus infection (Giaquinto et al., 2007).
Vaccination has proven to be effective in preventing rotavirus infections and limiting their impact (Vesikari et al., 2006). Although there are two rotavirus vaccines authorized for use in the European market, RotaTeq® and Rotarix®, our study has focused only on RotaTeq®, as it is the only vaccine available in Spain (Agencia Española de Medicamentos y Productos Sanitarios, 2010a, Agencia Española de Medicamentos y Productos Sanitarios, 2010b, Agencia Española de Medicamentos y Productos Sanitarios, 2010c). Currently the rotavirus vaccination is not included within the Spanish universal infant vaccination schedule, so RotaTeq® has to be purchased at market prices, as an out of pocket expense, if so desired.
The introduction of a new vaccine into the public immunization schedule would require a high resource investment and significant costs, taking into account that public vaccination programmes are, currently, completely publicly funded.
Cost-utility studies have been performed in some European countries, though not in the Spanish setting, estimating the costs of adding a Quality Adjusted Life Year (QALY) with mass vaccination versus no vaccination and adopting time dependence models. The assessments have differed in their assumptions, choice of model, contextual information, and other parameters, but also in their results. Some of them have concluded in favour of the introduction of the universal rotavirus vaccination (Atkins et al., 2012, Jit et al., 2009). However, most of them have come to the conclusion that the introduction of the vaccine would not be efficient with the current conditions, although a lower vaccine price could achieve a cost-effective result(Bilcke et al., 2009, Mangen et al., 2010, Melliez et al., 2008, Rozenbaum et al., 2011, Tilson et al., 2011).
An economic evaluation of rotavirus vaccination has recently been published for a specific region in Spain, “Castilla y León” (Pérez-Rubio et al., 2011). The study estimates the cost–utility ratio based on a decision tree that does not take into account time evolution and second episodes. Our study tries to overcome these limitations, using a Markov model, to compare the cost–utility of the universal infant rotavirus vaccination in Spain using RotaTeq® versus no vaccination. In addition, we assessed the effect on these results of varying different variables that feed the model.
Section snippets
Methods
A deterministic static Markov cohort model, adopting both the Spanish National Health System (SNHS) and the societal perspective, was developed for a hypothetical cohort of 500,000 newborns, which represents the approximate annual birth rate in Spain (INE, 2012). The model was built using the Tree Age Pro Suite 2011.
Two strategies were compared: one considering a fully publicly funded universal rotavirus vaccination with RotaTeq®, and the other considering no vaccination. In the vaccination
Results
The economic impact for the health care budget of introducing universal infant rotavirus vaccination with RotaTeq® in Spain would be 10.43 million euros per year (Table 4), which results from dividing the incremental costs from the SNHS perspective by five years. On the other hand, the impact from the societal perspective would be lower as the incremental cost per year would be 7.83 million euros.
Under the base case assumption, the vaccination strategy would be more expensive than the
Discussion
According to our results, the introduction of universal infant rotavirus vaccination using RotaTeq® would not be efficient in Spain and would only lead to a small improvement in quality of life at high costs. From the societal perspective, the gain of an additional QALY would cost an unaffordable amount, which would be even greater from the National Health Service perspective. In addition, the implementation of a vaccination programme against rotavirus offered to all Spanish infants between 2
Conclusion
According to our model and estimates, the introduction of a universal infant rotavirus vaccination in Spain would cause a large impact on the health care budget and would not be efficient unless large variations in vaccine price, vaccine efficacy and/or utilities took place.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.
Acknowledgments
Zuleika Saz Parkinson (BSc, PhD) is acknowledged because of her revision of the manuscript.
References (29)
- et al.
The cost-effectiveness of pentavalent rotavirus vaccination in England and Wales
Vaccine
(2012) - et al.
Use of cost-effectiveness analysis in health-care resource allocation decision-making: how are cost-effectiveness thresholds expected to emerge?
Value Health
(2004) - et al.
The cost-effectiveness of rotavirus vaccination: comparative analyses for five European countries and transferability in Europe
Vaccine
(2009) - et al.
Is it cost-effective to introduce rotavirus vaccination in the Dutch national immunization program?
Vaccine
(2010) - et al.
Effectiveness of childhood vaccination against rotavirus in sub-Saharan Africa: the case of Nigeria
Vaccine
(2007) - et al.
Cost and cost-effectiveness of childhood vaccination against rotavirus in France
Vaccine
(2008) - et al.
¿Qué es una tecnología sanitaria eficiente en España?
Gac. Sanit.
(2002) - et al.
Cost-effectiveness of universal rotavirus vaccination in reducing rotavirus gastroenteritis in Ireland
Vaccine
(2011) Nota informativa: detección de ADN de circovirus porcino tipo 1 y 2 (PCV-1 y PCV-2) en la vacuna frente a rotavirus Rotateq®
(2010)Nota informativa: Liberación de lotes de la vacuna Rotateq®
(2010)
Nota informativa para profesionales sanitarios. Detección de ADN de un circovirus porcino 1 (PCV-1) en la vacuna Rotarix®
Cost-effectiveness of rotavirus vaccination: exploring caregiver(s) and “no medical care” disease impact in Belgium
Med. Decis. Making
Health-related quality of life lost to rotavirus-associated gastroenteritis in children and their parents: a Canadian prospective study
Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J.
Prevention, Rotavirus surveillance—worldwide, 2001–2008
MMWR
Cited by (13)
Use of Utility and Disability Weights in Economic Evaluation of Pediatric Vaccines
2023, Value in HealthEconomic evaluation of rotavirus vaccination in children of Bhutan
2020, VaccineCitation Excerpt :However, the introduction of the vaccine would increase the workload of the vaccination programme managers and providers, such as health assistants, by around two to three FTE. The study findings are similar to those in France, Ireland, the Netherlands, and Spain [49–52]. This study also used the same analytical model – the UNIVAC – as those done in Afghanistan, South Korea, and Mongolia [12,16,53].
What have we learnt about rotavirus in Spain in the last 10 years?
2019, Anales de PediatriaEconomic burden of rotavirus diarrhea in Thailand: Report from a pilot study on rotavirus vaccination
2019, VaccineCitation Excerpt :The treatment costs were not different between the study sites in both bivariate analysis and multivariate regression analysis. The hospitalization cost was a major economic burden of rotavirus diarrhea by range 40% to 80% of the overall costs [33–36]. The main cost driver of direct medical costs was the hospital bed-day cost (reflecting 55% of the overall costs) which was consistent with previous studies [22,28,37,38].
Conceptualizations of the societal perspective within economic evaluations: A systematic review
2017, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care