Association for Academic Surgery
Surgical management and morbidity of pediatric magnet ingestions

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2015.04.007Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

Foreign body ingestion remains a common reason for emergency room visits and operative interventions in the pediatric population. Rare earth magnet ingestion represents a low percentage of all foreign bodies swallowed by children; however, magnets swallowed in multiplicity can result in severe injuries.

Materials and methods

Pediatric surgeons with membership in the Surgical Section of the American Academy of Pediatrics were surveyed to determine the magnitude and consequences of magnet ingestions in the pediatric population.

Results

About 100 (16%) participant responses reported on 99 magnet ingestions. The median age at ingestion was 3.7 y, and the majority of ingestions (71%) occurred after year 2010. Thirty-two children underwent endoscopy with successful removal in 70% of cases, and multiple magnets were found in 65% of these patients. Seventy-three children required either laparotomy (51) or laparoscopy (22) for magnet removal, and 90% of these children were discovered to have ingested more than one magnet. In addition, 17% of the children were found to have at least one perforation or fistula, and 34% of the children had multiple perforations or fistulae. Nine children required long-term care for their injuries including repeat endoscopies. One child died after hemorrhage from an esophago-aortic fistula.

Conclusions

These results demonstrated the increasing need for magnet regulations and public awareness to prevent potentially serious complications.

Introduction

In children, most ingested foreign bodies will pass spontaneously through the gastrointestinal tract without incident; however, several reports describe significant sequelae associated with rare earth (or neodymium) magnet ingestions including obstruction, fistulae, and perforation due to pressure necrosis. Although magnet ingestion is rare, the incidence has climbed with the popularity of magnetic toys. An increasing number of ingestion incidents reported to the United States Consumer and Product Safety Commission resulted in establishment of a mandatory standard to prevent magnets from detaching from toys. This standard also prohibits magnets and loose magnet components in toys for children under age 14 y [1]. Unfortunately, despite this regulation, vendors via the Internet continue to sell these products. Additionally, there has not been a broad-based public education of the problems associated with these magnets that are already in sold to the public.

Single magnet ingestion may pass without complication, but multiple magnet ingestion commonly requires either endoscopy or surgical intervention. Accordingly, patients with known or suspected magnet ingestion require timely management as initial signs and symptoms are often nonspecific. Improved education and safety standards may decrease the chance of magnet ingestion and help prevent the subsequent complications. The aim of this survey was to better define the surgical interventions and outcomes of magnet ingestions in the pediatric population.

Section snippets

Materials and methods

After receiving institutional review board approval (X130327003), an online survey was developed and distributed via e-mail to all pediatric surgeons with membership in the Surgical Section of the American Academy of Pediatrics. The questionnaire consisted of 37 multiple choice questions regarding demographics, ingestion prevalence, diagnostics, endoscopic and surgical interventions, and outcomes related to cases that occurred during the past 10 y. Survey responses were collected anonymously by

Results

Approximately 630 surgeons were polled with 101 (16%) participant responses reporting on 99 magnet ingestions. Survey respondent's demographics ranged equally with regard to number of years in practice with 21% <5 y, 13% 5–10 y, 28% 11–20 y, and 38% >20 y. The majority (66%) characterized their practice as an academic medical center-based pediatric surgery practice. The majority of ingestions reported (72%) occurred after the year 2010 (Fig. 1). The median age at ingestion was 3.7 y with a

Discussion

The increasing numbers of magnet ingestions demonstrate an unrelenting public health concern. According to the 2012 Annual Report of the American Association of Poison Control Centers Toxic Exposure Surveillance System, ingestion of foreign bodies remain in the top five of all human exposures with nearly 80,000 incidences reported to poison control in the pediatric population of age ≤5 y [2]. Although magnet ingestion remains fortunately rare, the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System

Acknowledgment

Authors' contributions: A.M.W. and E.A.B. did the analyzing of data and writing of the article. D.H.T. and E.A.B. contributed to the conceptualization of the study. D.H.T., V.T., A.B., and R.A.N. did the editing of the survey. D.H.T., A.B., E.A.B., and R.A.N. did the editing of the article. V.T. collected the data. E.A.B. did the writing survey.

References (13)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (49)

  • Pediatric Ingestions

    2022, Surgical Clinics of North America
  • Multiple Ball Magnet Ingestion With Sandwiching of the Uvula

    2022, Journal of Emergency Medicine
    Citation Excerpt :

    On the contrary, two or more high-powered magnets progressing through the gastrointestinal tract tend to forcefully attract each other and so, lead to the interposition of bowel loops between them. This leads to an increased risk of intestinal obstruction, fistula formation, and perforation due to pressure necrosis, usually within hours after ingestion (3–5). Nonoperative management of asymptomatic foreign body ingestion of regular monitoring for spontaneous fecal passage.

  • Enteroenteric fistulae after ingestion of multiple magnets in children

    2022, Journal of Pediatric Surgery Case Reports
    Citation Excerpt :

    In our cases also there was a delay in presentation as the children were very young to express themselves and nobody witnessed the ingestion of magnets balls. They may also present with life-threatening GIT bleeding from an aortoesophageal fistula [18], bowel obstruction, volvulus, intestinal perforation, intestinal fistula, peritonitis, short-bowel syndrome caused by massive bowel resection, life-threatening injuries, and even death caused by ingestion of multiple magnets or co-ingestion of other metallic objects with a magnet [19–31] or may have no symptoms at all even with confirmed ingestion [4]. In one series the intestinal perforation rate was 50% [32].

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text