Elsevier

Injury

Volume 47, Issue 3, March 2016, Pages 539-544
Injury

Review
Intramuscular diaphragmatic stimulation for patients with traumatic high cervical injuries and ventilator dependent respiratory failure: A systematic review of safety and effectiveness

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2015.12.020Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

Intramuscular diaphragmatic stimulation using an abdominal laparoscopic approach has been proposed as a safer alternative to traditional phrenic nerve stimulation. It has also been suggested that early implementation of diaphragmatic pacing may prevent diaphragm atrophy and lead to earlier ventilator independence. The aim of this study was therefore to systematically review the safety and effectiveness of intramuscular diaphragmatic stimulators in the treatment of patients with traumatic high cervical injuries resulting in long-term ventilator dependence, with particular emphasis on the affect of timing of insertion of such stimulators.

Methods

The Cochrane database and PubMed were searched between January 2000 and June 2015. Reference lists of selected papers were also reviewed. The inclusion criteria used to select from the pool of eligible studies were: (1) reported on adult patients with traumatic high cervical injury, who were ventilator-dependant, (2) patients underwent intramuscular diaphragmatic stimulation, and (3) commented on safety and/or effectiveness.

Results

12 articles were included in the review. Reported safety issues post insertion of intramuscular electrodes included pneumothorax, infection, and interaction with pre-existing cardiac pacemaker. Only one procedural failure was reported. The percentage of patients reported as independent of ventilatory support post procedure ranged between 40% and 72.2%. The mean delay of insertion ranged from 40 days to 9.7 years; of note the study with the average shortest delay in insertion reported the greatest percentage of fully weaned patients.

Conclusions

Although evidence for intramuscular diaphragmatic stimulation in patients with high cervical injuries and ventilator dependent respiratory failure is currently limited, the technique appears to be safe and effective. Earlier implantation of such devices does not appear to be associated with greater surgical risk, and may be more effective. Further high quality studies are warranted to investigate the impact of delay of insertion on ventilator weaning.

Introduction

Spinal cord injury is a serious condition primarily affecting young adults resulting in significant disability or death. Worldwide, the prevalence of spinal cord injury is estimated to be between 3.6 and 195.4 per million [1]. The majority of such cases are traumatic in nature with road traffic accidents, falls, and recreational activities being the most common mechanism of injury.

Approximately 20% of spinal cord injuries occur between the levels of C1 and C4. Patients with such injuries are at high risk of respiratory complications, and invariably require mechanical ventilation at hospital discharge [2]. The mainstay of treatment for patients with ventilator-dependant spinal cord injury is positive pressure mechanical ventilation. Due to the nature of these ventilator devices, the ability to cough is impaired, increasing the risk of respiratory tract infections. Although regular suction of secretions helps avoid these complications, this can be intrusive and disruptive for patients. Therefore, ventilated patients have increased mortality and decreased independence compared to patients with similar injuries who are not ventilated [3].

In selected patients with ventilator-dependent spinal cord injury, phrenic nerve stimulation, also known as diaphragmatic pacing, is an alternative to standard mechanical ventilation. Regular electrical pulses applied directly to the nerve via implanted phrenic nerve stimulators cause contraction of the diaphragm, resulting in the intake of air.

Each phrenic nerve is formed by the cervical rootlets from the C3 to C5 spinal cord segments. For successful diaphragmatic pacing, it is imperative that the phrenic motor neurons are viable. Patients with mid cervical injuries often have damaged phrenic motor neurons. However, in patients with upper cervical spinal cord injuries, the somatic neuromuscular and mechanical function of the respiratory apparatus below the level of injury usually remain intact and are amenable to electrical stimulation to restore function [4]. Therefore patients with injuries cephalad to the C3–C5 spinal cord segments are ideal candidates.

Diaphragmatic pacing offers the ability to limit some of the changes in respiratory physiology seen in chronic spinal cord injury. Over time, ventilator-dependent spinal cord injury can result in a decrease in total lung capacity. There exists an inverse relationship between forced vital capacity and higher levels of injury [5]. Although it has been thought that the loss of gas containing alveoli causes the changes in pressure volume curves, one study suggested that lung distensibility is related to changes in elasticity of lung tissue [6].

Early phrenic nerve stimulators all used electrodes placed in direct contact with the phrenic nerve through an open cervical or thoracic approach. These implant procedures are invasive, requiring mobilisation of nerves that may result in their injury [7]. Recently, intramuscular diaphragmatic stimulation using an abdominal laparoscopic approach has been proposed instead, in an effort to reduce the risk of phrenic nerve injury.

The timing of diaphragmatic pacing is contentious. Typically, implantation is avoided in the acute setting due to safety concerns associated with surgery in unstable patients. However, animal studies suggest that a significant amount of phrenic motor neurones are lost during the first 24 h post-injury, resulting in persistent phrenic nerve axonal degenerations and denervation at the diaphragm neuromuscular junction [8]. Provided the phrenic motor neurons are viable, the clinical corollary is that early surgery may be more effective.

The aim of this study was to systematically review the safety and effectiveness of intramuscular diaphragmatic stimulators in the treatment of patients with traumatic high cervical injuries resulting in long-term ventilator dependence. Particular emphasis was placed on the timing of insertion of such stimulators.

Section snippets

Methods

The review protocol was registered on the PROSPERO international prospective register of systematic reviews. The Preferred Reporting Items For Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement was used in the preparation of this manuscript.

Results

A total of 145 retrieved articles were located on the initial search, and two further articles were retrieved from reference lists for further analysis (Fig. 1). We excluded 131 articles on the basis of their title and abstract as they did not feature adult patients with traumatic high cervical injury or patients did not undergo intramuscular diaphragmatic stimulation. Full text screening of the remaining articles led to the exclusion of a further four articles. In all, 12 eligible articles

Discussion

In this systematic review, we have demonstrated that evidence for the use of intramuscular diaphragmatic stimulation in patients with traumatic high cervical injuries and ventilator dependent respiratory failure is presently limited. Nonetheless, the technique appears to a safe and effective alternative to conventional phrenic nerve stimulation. Moreover, earlier implantation of such devices in selected patients does not appear to be associated with greater surgical risk, and may be more

Conclusions

In conclusion, although the evidence is presently limited, intramuscular diaphragmatic stimulation for patients with traumatic high cervical injuries and ventilator dependent respiratory failure appears to be both safe and effective. Following traumatic cervical spinal cord injury, early laparoscopic diaphragm motor point mapping can immediately identify patients with intact phrenic nerves and enable implantation of diaphragmatic pacemakers. This may have the advantage of shortening the

Authors’ contribution

BG, AW and HJM were involved with the study design, data acquisition, data analysis, and data interpretation. KT, MHW and MK were involved with the study design, and data interpretation. All authors were involved with drafting and critical revision of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors report no specific funding for this study.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflict of interest concerning the materials or methods used in this study or the findings specified in this paper.

References (34)

  • C. Winslow et al.

    Effect of spinal cord injury on the respiratory system

    Am J Phys Med Rehab

    (2003)
  • M. Estenne et al.

    Lung-volume restriction in patients with chronic respiratory muscle weakness – the role of microatelectasis

    Thorax

    (1993)
  • D.E. Weese-Mayer et al.

    Diaphragm pacing with a quadripolar phrenic nerve electrode: an international study

    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol: PACE

    (1996)
  • C. Nicaise et al.

    Early phrenic motor neuron loss and transient respiratory abnormalities after unilateral cervical spinal cord contusion

    J Neurotrauma

    (2013)
  • K. Slim et al.

    Methodological index for non-randomized studies (minors): development and validation of a new instrument

    ANZ J Surg

    (2003)
  • J.A. Posluszny et al.

    Multicenter review of diaphragm pacing in spinal cord injury: successful not only in weaning from ventilators but also in bridging to independent respiration

    J Trauma Acute Care Surg

    (2014)
  • M.L. Tedde et al.

    Electric ventilation: indications for and technical aspects of diaphragm pacing stimulation surgical implantation

    Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia: publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia

    (2012)
  • Cited by (18)

    • Long-term experience with diaphragm pacing for traumatic spinal cord injury: Early implantation should be considered

      2018, Surgery (United States)
      Citation Excerpt :

      Because the DP system is percutaneous, the DP electrodes can be easily removed with gentle traction at the bedside. The literature on the use of intramuscular DP has been growing and was recently summarized by Garara et al at the Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust.9 After analyzing 12 publications, they concluded that DP was safe and effective.

    • Oxygen Therapeutics and Mechanical Ventilation Advances

      2017, Critical Care Clinics
      Citation Excerpt :

      Others investigators have more recently engaged in diaphragm stimulation using an intramuscular technique. This approach has been better studied than AFES and reports a success rate for liberation from mechanical ventilation of 40% to 72%, with earlier implantation seeming to increase liberation success.56 These data suggest that diaphragm recruitment is feasible and may not only be a reasonable approach to diaphragm denervation from cervical injury but may also be anticipated to affect ventilator-induced diaphragm injury (VIDI).

    • First Experience with Diaphragm Pacing System in the Czech Republic

      2023, Acta Chirurgiae Orthopaedicae et Traumatologiae Cechoslovaca
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text