Improved glycemic control without an increase in severe hypoglycemic episodes in intensively treated patients with type 1 diabetes receiving morning, evening, or split dose insulin glargine

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2004.02.008Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective: To see if insulin glargine improves glycemic control in a clinical setting. Research design and methods: A questionnaire and electronic database were used to assess glycemic parameters for 292 type 1 diabetic subjects taking ≥4 injections per day and receiving glargine as their only long-acting basal insulin for at least 6 months. Sixty-three subjects were taking glargine in the morning, 125 were taking glargine in the evening, and 104 were splitting the glargine dose between the morning and evening. Results: The mean (±S.D.) age and duration of diabetes were 32±10 years and 15.9±10.3 years, respectively. The mean (±S.E.M.) durations of treatment with glargine were 13.1±0.6 months, 12.2±0.4 months, and 14.3±0.5 months for the morning, evening, and split treatment groups, respectively (P<0.01). The A1C values improved significantly from baseline for the evening and the split dosage groups or when all groups were combined. The mean basal insulin dose was significantly reduced at the end of the study in all the three groups from baseline with no change in the short-acting insulin dose. The number of severe hypoglycemic episodes decreased from 379 in the year prior to glargine treatment to 167 in the post-glargine year. The weight gain was significantly higher in the group that took the split glargine dose (P<0.01). Conclusions: Similar or improved glycemic control was achieved by administering glargine in the morning, evening, or using a split dose without any further increase in severe hypoglycemic episodes. Splitting the glargine dose did not offer any advantages in glycemic control parameters.

Introduction

Several prospective studies have shown the importance of improving glycemic control to reduce the risk for microvascular complications both in people with type 1 [1] and type 2 [2], [3] diabetes. The intensive treatment groups in all of these studies had reduced microvascular complications but increased their risk for severe hypoglycemic episodes.

New insulin analogues, beginning with insulin lispro (Humalog®), have resulted in improved glycemic control without an increase in severe hypoglycemic events [4], [5], [6]. The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the short-acting insulins, insulin lispro [7] and more recently insulin aspart (Novolog®) [8], have been shown to be closer to physiologic insulin secretion for the post-prandial state with rapid onset of action [7], [8] and a peak effect at approximately 1 h [4], [6]. The short-acting analog usage has significantly reduced hypoglycemia especially at night when compared to human regular insulin. All the studies on new short-acting analogs, in the past, included using intermediate-acting insulins, e.g. NPH and/or Ultralente [4], [5], [6], [7], [8].

The use of intermediate-acting insulins NPH and Ultralente as basal insulins have several limitations that include: (1) large inter- and intra-individual variations due to the presence of excipients that need to be properly re-suspended [9], [10]; (2) peak effect at approximately 4–6 h; and (3) hypoglycemia after 4–6 h due to undesired peak effect and thus need of a mid-morning and/or mid-afternoon snack resulting in weight gain. More recently, a new basal insulin, insulin glargine (Lantus®), has become available which more closely simulates normal human basal insulin secretion. It has a 24-h basal insulin profile with almost no peak in activity [9], [10]. Although there have been prospective research studies of insulin glargine documenting its safety and efficacy [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], there are no reports of its use in a “real-life” clinic setting. There are also no reports comparing morning, evening, and split dosage (morning and evening) injections of glargine.

The purpose of this investigator-initiated report was to determine the efficacy of morning, evening, or morning plus evening split injections of insulin glargine in adult patients with type 1 diabetes in a general diabetes outpatient clinical setting.

Section snippets

Research design and methods

The Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes, Denver, CO, has an electronic patient record system, which has been used to retrospectively evaluate selected outcomes such as those related to treatment patterns. For this study, 292 adults with type 1 diabetes met the following inclusion criteria: (a) treatment with insulin glargine as their only basal insulin given either in the morning, evening, or in a split dose (morning and evening) for at least 6 months; (b) at least 1 year of insulin

Results

The mean (±S.D.) age of the 292 subjects was 32±10.0 years, which did not vary significantly (P=0.13) between groups (Table 1). The three groups had a mean duration of diabetes of >13 years with the mean (±S.D.) duration of diabetes of 18.7±11.3 years, 13.9±9.8 years, and 16.4±9.9 years for the morning, evening, and split dose glargine groups, respectively (P<0.01, Table 1). The mean (±S.D.) duration of diabetes for the total group was 15.9±10.3 years (Table 1). The mean (±S.E.M.) duration of

Conclusions

This study showed that glycemic control improved significantly following insulin glargine therapy when all groups were combined or in subjects receiving glargine in the evening or as a split dose. The patients were followed in a general diabetes clinic and were not in a prospective randomized clinical trial. Thus the decrease in A1C is not due to a study effect (which is commonly seen) as subjects were followed for more than 1 year and could be due to the change in basal insulin from NPH since

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by Public Health Services, Research Grant 5 M01 RR00051, from the Division of Research Resources, and by the Children’s Diabetes Foundation, Denver, CO. The authors would like to thank Dawn White and Halsley Hoff for preparation of the manuscript.

References (22)

  • D.R. Owens et al.

    Insulin glargine (Lantus)

    Int. J. Clin. Pract

    (2002)
  • Cited by (75)

    • Twice-daily insulin glargine for patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes mellitus

      2019, Journal of Clinical and Translational Endocrinology
    • Glycemic Management in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes

      2018, Canadian Journal of Diabetes
    • Comparison of glycemic variability in Japanese patients with type 1 diabetes receiving insulin degludec versus insulin glargine using continuous glucose monitoring: A randomized, cross-over, pilot study

      2016, Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice
      Citation Excerpt :

      As basal insulin that forms part of basal-bolus insulin therapy, long-acting soluble insulin is shown to provide more stable glycemic control than does intermediate insulin [8,9]. Of the two long-acting insulin formulations commonly used, insulin glargine and insulin detemir, it is shown that their efficacy is not necessarily consistently sustained over 24 h [10–12], which led to twice-daily insulin glargine and insulin detemir being recommended as basal insulin in basal-bolus therapy in type 1 diabetic patients to provide flat basal insulin supplementation [13]. In contrast, insulin degludec (Des (B30) LysB29 (γ-GluNε-hexadecandioyl) human insulin), which has recently become available as ultra-long-acting basal insulin, is reported to provide sustained glucose-lowering efficacy over 42 h with its half-life extended to 25 h [14], as well as a flat insulin profile with once-daily injections [15] that is associated with very few glycemic fluctuations over 24 h [16].

    • Insulin Therapy in Type 1 Diabetes

      2015, Medical Clinics of North America
      Citation Excerpt :

      Basal insulin with insulin glargine or detemir is dosed once or twice daily. Previously administered at night to better match glucose elevations with the dawn phenomenon, recent studies note that basal dosing can be equally effective when given either in the morning, evening, or as a split dose,27 providing flexibility of dosing and promoting adherence. For insulin-sensitive patients, splitting basal insulin into twice-daily dosing may reduce the risk of hypoglycemia that could occur with a single larger dose.

    • Pharmacothérapie du diabète de type 1

      2013, Canadian Journal of Diabetes
      Citation Excerpt :

      Il n’y a pas de différences entre l’hypoglycémie provoquée par l’insuline humaine régulière et celle provoquée par les analogues de l’insuline à action rapide en ce qui a trait à l’importance et à l’évolution temporelle des réponses physiologiques et symptomatiques et de celles des hormones de la contre-régulation (59,60), mais on a montré que la fréquence des hypoglycémies était moindre avec les analogues de l’insuline à action rapide qu’avec l’insuline régulière (18–21). Les analogues de l’insuline à action prolongée peuvent réduire l’incidence de l’hypoglycémie et de l’hypoglycémie nocturne par rapport à l’insuline basale à action intermédiaire (36,37,61–64). Les écarts par rapport aux comportements d’autogestion recommandés ou convenables (tels que réduction de la ration alimentaire, augmentation des doses d’insuline et intensification des activités physiques) sont responsables de 85 % des hypoglycémies (65,66).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text