Pediatrics/original research
A Comprehensive View of Parental Satisfaction With Pediatric Emergency Department Visits

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2013.04.025Get rights and content

Study objective

We develop a comprehensive view of aspects of care associated with parental satisfaction with pediatric emergency department (ED) visits, using both quantitative and qualitative data.

Methods

This was a retrospective observational study using data from an institution-wide system to measure patient satisfaction. For this study, 2,442 parents who brought their child to the ED were interviewed with telephone survey methods. The survey included closed-ended (quantitative) and open-ended (qualitative data) questions, in addition to a cognitive interview–style question.

Results

Overall parental satisfaction was best predicted by how well physicians and nurses work together, followed by wait time and pain management. Issues concerning timeliness of care, perceived quality of medical care, and communication were raised repeatedly by parents in response to open-ended questions. A cognitive interview–style question showed that physicians and nurses sharing information with each other, parents receiving consistent and detailed explanations of their child's diagnosis and treatments, and not having to answer the same question repeatedly informed parent perceptions of physicians and nurses working well together. Staff showing courtesy and respect through compassion and caring words and behaviors and paying attention to nonmedical needs are other potential satisfiers with emergency care.

Conclusion

Using qualitative data to augment and clarify quantitative data from patient experience of care surveys is essential to obtaining a complete picture of aspects of emergency care important to parents and can help inform quality improvement work aimed at improving satisfaction with care.

Introduction

The Institute of Medicine report Emergency Care for Children: Growing Pains1 emphasizes the importance of delivering patient- and family-centered care in pediatric emergency medicine. Although parental satisfaction with care is an important patient- and family-centered care outcome, providing such care can be challenging, given the nature of the emergency care experience. These challenges include emergency department (ED) crowding, the acute nature of the visit, lack of established relationships between health care providers and patients or parents, and the occasional absence of parents or guardians.2 ED crowding has been negatively associated with satisfaction with care.3 Furthermore, interactions with health care providers are often short and intense, leaving little room to address emotional, psychological, and social needs.2, 4, 5

Given these challenges, improving the delivery of patient- and family-centered care in an ED setting requires a comprehensive view of health care provider behaviors and system characteristics that drive satisfaction with the visit. In the adult emergency care literature, the following have been shown to be drivers of overall satisfaction: timeliness of care6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17; information provided about the diagnosis, care, and treatment9, 11, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19; caring and empathy7, 11, 17, 19, 20; the degree to which the staff was organized11; the perceived technical quality of care7, 9, 17, 21; the quality of interpersonal interactions9, 15, 22; explanations of delays in care14, 19; feelings of safety and security7; understandable discharge instructions7, 14; health care provider courtesy10; thoroughness of the physician10; and pain management.17, 19

The few published studies that address satisfaction with pediatric emergency care have shown that provider interactions,23 pain management,23, 24, 25 information and explanations provided,23, 25 ability to stay with the child,25 staff attitude,25 and wait time24, 26 are associated with overall satisfaction with care. Almost all the published studies used quantitative data resulting from surveys administered to patients or parents. To our knowledge, only 1 study of adolescents' perceptions of emergency care augmented quantitative data from close-ended questions with qualitative data from open-ended questions. The objective of that study was to identify factors associated with adolescent satisfaction with emergency care. Using quantitative methods, interpersonal communication and respect were found to be associated with overall satisfaction. In addition, an open-ended question was used to elicit what adolescents would have liked to change about the care they received, which resulted in 4 themes: no changes were necessary, enhance interpersonal communication, improve comfort of stay, and shorter length of stay.27

Satisfaction with care has been associated with improved adherence to medical regimens and health-related outcomes in other populations.5, 28, 29 A comprehensive view of the drivers of overall parental satisfaction with care in pediatric emergency care is an important step toward improving the delivery of quality patient- and family-centered care. Using quantitative survey data alone, however, may not provide a comprehensive view of drivers of overall satisfaction with care. Aspects of care important to parents may be missed if not included in close-ended survey questions. Also, close-ended questions often do not provide adequate detail about specific health care provider behaviors or system characteristics needed to inform quality improvement work. The use of both quantitative and qualitative data can provide a more robust view of aspects of care important to parents associated with overall satisfaction.

The objective of this study was to develop a comprehensive view of aspects of care associated with parental satisfaction with pediatric ED visits, using both quantitative and qualitative data.

Section snippets

Study Design

This was a retrospective observational study using data from a telephone survey used to measure parental satisfaction with care received in a pediatric ED. The survey is part of ongoing institution-wide efforts to improve satisfaction with care. This study was approved by the hospital's institutional review board and was determined to be exempt from ongoing board oversight.

Setting

This study was conducted at a large, urban, tertiary care, pediatric teaching hospital. The ED has a patient census of

Characteristics of Study Subjects

The response rate for this survey was, on average, 50%. During the study period 2,442 parents completed the survey. Table 2 summarizes characteristics (age, sex, race, insurance, admitted to hospital) of the study sample compared with those of the study population.

Main Results

All but 8 parents provided an overall satisfaction rating. Of those providing a rating, 9% rated their overall satisfaction 0 to 6; 23%, 7 to 8; and 68%, 9 to 10. Figure 1 summarizes which aspects of care exhibit the highest potential

Limitations

This study has several limitations. First, it is a single site study in a large academic setting, which may not be generalizable to other settings or regions.

Second, there are inherent biases in telephone surveys. The nonresponse rate was approximately 50% and we do not know whether nonresponders would have answered differently. Table 2, however, indicates that the demographic characteristics of the sample were very similar to that of the population of patients who visited our ED.

Third, the

In Retrospect

The qualitative data in this study have shown that the drivers of overall satisfaction are multifaceted and not mutually exclusive. The use of both quantitative and qualitative data elucidated the complex nature of these drivers and the relationships between them, enabling us to develop a more comprehensive picture of what is important to parents of children who visit an ED.

The quantitative data showed that the most important drivers of overall parent satisfaction were how well physicians and

References (50)

  • D. Debehnke et al.

    The effects of a physician-nurse patient care team on patient satisfaction in an academic ED

    Am J Emerg Med

    (2002)
  • Committee on the Future of Emergency Care in the United States Health System. Emergency Care for Children: Growing Pains

    (2007)
  • J.M. Baren

    Rising to the challenge of family-centered care in emergency medicine

    Acad Emerg Med

    (2001)
  • J.M. Pines et al.

    The effect of emergency department crowding on patient satisfaction for admitted patients

    Acad Emerg Med

    (2008)
  • P. O'Malley et al.

    Patient- and family-centered care and the role of the emergency physician providing care to a child in the emergency department

    Pediatrics

    (2006)
  • P.J. O'Malley et al.

    Patient- and family-centered care of children in the emergency department

    Pediatrics

    (2008)
  • S.J. Aragon et al.

    A patient satisfaction theory and its robustness across gender in emergency departments: a multigroup structural equation modeling investigation

    Am J Med Qual

    (2003)
  • E.D. Boudreaux et al.

    Emergency department patient satisfaction: examining the role of acuity

    Acad Emerg Med

    (2004)
  • I. Pitrou et al.

    Waiting time and assessment of patient satisfaction in a large reference emergency department: a prospective cohort study, France

    Eur J Emerg Med

    (2009)
  • A. Trout et al.

    Patient satisfaction investigations and the emergency department: what does the literature say?

    Acad Emerg Med

    (2000)
  • S.J. Welch

    Twenty years of patient satisfaction research applied to the emergency department: a qualitative review

    Am J Med Qual

    (2010)
  • D. Taylor et al.

    A multifaceted intervention improves patient satisfaction and perceptions of emergency department care

    Int J Qual Health Care

    (2006)
  • P.R. Yarnold et al.

    Predicting patient satisfaction: a study of two emergency departments

    J Behav Med

    (1998)
  • G. Toma et al.

    Patient satisfaction as a function of emergency department previsit expectations

    Ann Emerg Med

    (2009)
  • N.D. Magaret et al.

    Patient satisfaction in the emergency department—a survey of pediatric patients and their parents

    Acad Emerg Med

    (2002)
  • Cited by (61)

    • Do Pediatrician Interpersonal and Personality Characteristics Affect Patient Experience?

      2023, Academic Pediatrics
      Citation Excerpt :

      In our sample, EM pediatricians were significantly more likely to receive a low rating. The EM pediatrician ratings in our study were comparable to rates reported in other pediatric studies.40 Factors unique to the emergency setting including long wait times, visit acuity, and lack of an established relationship with the EM pediatrician could challenge patient care experiences ratings41 and may have affected the current study results.

    • Care of suspected long bone fractures in the emergency department: Families' perspectives and priorities

      2023, American Journal of Emergency Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      Patient satisfaction measures of their care are not necessarily associated with the provision of care consistent with accepted standards of care [27,28]. Asking pediatric patients about their experiences is essential [29]. Although an important first step in identifying families' priorities in pediatric ED trauma care, this tertiary care single center study's results may not be applicable to all settings.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    A feedback survey is available with each research article published on the Web at www.annemergmed.com.

    A podcast for this article is available at www.annemergmed.com.

    Please see page 341 for the Editor's Capsule Summary of this article.

    Supervising editor: Robert L. Wears, MD, PhD

    Author contributions: TLB conceived and designed the study, obtained research support, worked with the James M. Anderson Center for Health Systems Excellence to procure the data, conducted the quantitative data analysis, and drafted the article. All authors participated in the qualitative data analysis and contributed substantially to article revision. TLB takes responsibility for the paper as a whole.

    Funding and support: By Annals policy, all authors are required to disclose any and all commercial, financial, and other relationships in any way related to the subject of this article as per ICMJE conflict of interest guidelines (see www.icmje.org). The authors have stated that no such relationships exist. The work was supported by the Division of Emergency Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center. The James M. Anderson Center managed and oversaw the data collection.

    Publication date: Available online June 17, 2013.

    View full text