Elsevier

Academic Pediatrics

Volume 13, Issue 6, Supplement, November–December 2013, Pages S69-S74
Academic Pediatrics

QI in Clinical Settings
Pediatric Collaborative Networks for Quality Improvement and Research

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2013.07.004Get rights and content

Abstract

Despite efforts of individual clinicians, pediatric practices, and institutions to remedy continuing deficiencies in pediatric safety and health care quality, multiple gaps and disparities exist. Most pediatric diseases are rare; thus, few practices or centers care for sufficient numbers of children, particularly in subspecialties, to achieve large and representative sample sizes, and substantial between-site variation in care and outcomes persists. Pediatric collaborative improvement networks are multi-site clinical networks that allow practice-based teams to learn from one another, test changes to improve quality, and use their collective experience and data to understand, implement, and spread what works in practice. The model was initially developed in 2002 by an American Board of Pediatrics Workgroup to accelerate the translation of evidence into practice, improve care and outcomes for children, and to serve as the gold standard for the performance in practice component of Maintenance of Certification requirements. Many features of an improvement network derive from the Institute for Healthcare Improvement's collaborative improvement model Breakthrough Series, including focus on a high-impact condition or topic; providing support from clinical content and quality improvement experts; using the Model for Improvement to set aims, use data for feedback, and test changes iteratively; providing infrastructure support for data collection, analysis and reporting, and quality improvement coaching; activities to enhance collaboration; and participation of multidisciplinary teams from multiple sites. In addition, they typically include a population registry of the children receiving care for the improvement topic of interest. These registries provide large and representative study samples with high-quality data that can be used to generate information and evidence, as well as to inform clinical decision making. In addition to quality improvement, networks serve as large-scale health system laboratories, providing the social, scientific, and technical infrastructure and data for multiple types of research. Statewide, regional, and national pediatric collaborative networks have demonstrated improvements in primary care practice as well as care for chronic pediatric diseases (eg, asthma, cystic fibrosis, inflammatory bowel disease, congenital heart disease), perinatal care, and patient safety (eg, central line–associated blood stream infections, adverse medication events, surgical site infections); many have documented improved outcomes. Challenges to spreading the improvement network model exist, including the need for the identification of stable funding sources. However, these barriers can be overcome, allowing the benefits of improved care and outcomes to spread to additional clinical and safety topics and care processes for the nation's children.

Section snippets

History of the Pediatric Collaborative Improvement Network Model

In 2002, the Quality in Pediatric Subspecialty Care workgroup, chartered by the American Board of Pediatrics (ABP), initially developed the model as a means to accelerate the translation of evidence into practice, to improve care and outcomes for children, and to serve as the gold standard for the performance in practice component of Maintenance of Certification (MOC) requirements for subspecialty practice.6 This model built on successful examples of cooperative multisite clinical efforts that

How Pediatric Improvement Networks Work

Many of the features of pediatric collaborative improvement networks are derived at least in part from the Breakthrough Series model, the Institute for Healthcare Improvement's collaborative model for achieving improvement6:

  • Focus on a high-impact condition, health topic, or safety issue that can affect patient outcomes, engage caregivers, and address a key population group, and that is a widely recognized problem.

  • Obtain support from both clinical content and quality improvement experts who

Research in Collaborative Improvement Networks

In addition to a key focus on quality improvement, networks provide a strong foundation for research, which includes: 1) a robust data infrastructure; 2) standardization of care processes to reduce practice-to-practice variation, thereby increasing the ability to detect the impact of changes; and 3) a mechanism to engage all the key stakeholders– patients, families, clinicians, and researchers–in testing changes at the site of care delivery.23 They serve as large-scale health system

Children's Hospital Association Quality Transformation Network

The Quality Transformation Network (QTN), managed by the Children's Hospital Association for its member hospitals, is the largest quality improvement network in pediatrics.25 QTN conducts coordinated quality improvement collaboratives for high-impact pediatric topics. Initial efforts focused on preventing central line associated blood stream infections (CLABSIs) by standardizing practices related to line insertion and maintenance. In 29 pediatric intensive care units participating in these

Conclusion

Pediatric collaborative improvement networks apply scientific methods (including system science, quality improvement methodology, and qualitative research) and a structured approach to the design, development, and experimental testing of innovations in care delivery. They use collaboration and share data, ultimately standardizing practice. Therefore, variation in outcomes due to unreliable and unnecessary care delivery is reduced, increasing statistical power and allowing a stable system from

Acknowledgments

Dr Lannon receives partial support from the pediatric Center for Education and Research on Therapeutics, supported by cooperative agreement U19HS021114 from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

References (62)

  • J.M. Perrin et al.

    The quality of children's health care matters—time to pay attention

    N Engl J Med

    (2007)
  • Lannon CM, Miles PV. Pediatric collaborative improvement networks: bridging the gap to improve child health outcomes....
  • Lannon CL, Peterson LE. Pediatric collaborative improvement networks: background and overview. Pediatrics....
  • Children's Oncology Group: About Us. Available at: http://www.childrensoncologygroup.org/index.php/about. Accessed...
  • G.T. O’Connor et al.

    A regional prospective study of in-hospital mortality associated with coronary artery bypass grafting. The Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group

    JAMA

    (1991)
  • G.T. O’Connor et al.

    A regional intervention to improve the hospital mortality associated with coronary artery bypass graft surgery. The Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group

    JAMA

    (1996)
  • D.S. Likosky et al.

    Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group. Improving outcomes of cardiac surgery through cooperative efforts: the Northern New England experience

    Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth

    (2005)
  • Cystic Fibrosis Foundation: About the Foundation. Available at: http://www.cff.org/aboutCFFoundation/. Accessed...
  • Institute of Medicine Roundtable on Evidence-Based Medicine

  • Clancy C. Hints of a different way—case studies in practice-based evidence. Opening remarks. Presentation at: Institute...
  • ...
  • Y. Benkler

    The Penguin and the Leviathan: How Cooperation Triumphs Over Self-interest

    (2011)
  • Y. Benkler

    The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom

    (2006)
  • G.J. Langley et al.

    The Improvement Guide: A Practical Approach to Enhancing Organizational Performance

    (2009)
  • J.D. Kugler et al.

    Development of a pediatric cardiology quality improvement collaborative: from inception to implementation. From the Joint Council on Congenital Heart Disease Quality Improvement Task Force

    Congenit Heart Dis

    (2009)
  • W. Crandall et al.

    ImproveCareNow: the development of a pediatric inflammatory bowel disease improvement network

    Inflamm Bowel Dis

    (2011)
  • Clancy CM, Margolis PA, Miller M. Collaborative networks for both improvement and research. Pediatrics. 2013;131(Suppl...
  • Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. Helfand M, Berg A, Flum D, Gabriel S, Normand SL; PCORI Methodology...
  • Billett AL, Colletti RB, Mandel KE, et al. Exemplar pediatric collaborative improvement networks: achieving results....
  • M.R. Miller et al.

    Reducing PICU central line-associated bloodstream infections: 3-year results

    Pediatrics

    (2011)
  • A. Blumenthal

    The stories behind the stats: NACHRI quality transformation network reaches milestone

    Pediatr Nurs

    (2011)
  • Cited by (68)

    • Increasing Use of the Right Ventricle-to-Pulmonary Artery Shunt for Stage 1 Palliation

      2023, Annals of Thoracic Surgery
      Citation Excerpt :

      Phase one data included only patients who were discharged home during the interstage period and only through their readmission date for S2P. Phase two data included all patients from the date of diagnosis through their first birthday.18 We performed automated extraction of each to obtain our initial raw data and combined these 2 databases into a singular data set for statistical analysis.

    • Addressing the Impact of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic on Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: Learning Networks as a Means for Sharing Best Practices

      2020, Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation
      Citation Excerpt :

      Recent evidence demonstrates that collaborative learning health networks can achieve marked improvement in the quality of care [127,131-134]. Learning network leaders facilitate alignment of the community around a common goal and have standards, processes, policies, and infrastructure in place to enable collaboration [135,136]. They use a platform for sharing ideas and resources that includes best practice materials and pertinent tools to address the mission of the network [137].

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    The views expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of the US Department of Health and Human Services, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality or the American Board of Pediatrics Foundation.

    The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

    Publication of this article was supported by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and the American Board of Pediatrics Foundation.

    View full text